Nothing much went wrong with the software itself, but what about the knock-on effect we were expecting. I suppose that most of us remember the Hikaru Boom(HNG), when all these kids started playing the game. Across the world there was a big surge of new players, and all associations saw a boost in numbers. AlphaGo brought a huge publicity kick, it also brought some money to organisations like the EGF. What happened that we were unable to harness that to bring in more players. The figures below are for UK membership. I would have probably expected it to be one of the organisations that would benefit most, since it had DeepMind based in its country, and it had advanced knowledge that it was going to expect a mammoth publicity boost. It seems to follow the trend of most countries though, just a gradual decrease post HNG...

_________________
North Lecale

HNG inspires people to keep progressing as they reach higher to find the hand of God.

Alphago showed people that even pros can't win against AI so it made many people wonder why they should even bother especially when people they play against online might be using AI to play against them.

_________________
http://tchan001.wordpress.com
A blog on Asian go books, go sightings, and interesting tidbits
Go is such a beautiful game.

I also liked the cultural aspect of go, like people following pros in Asia.

Pessimistic rant:

_________________
be immersed

It's very probably true that HNG was more inspirational, and more inspirational to young impressionable minds, but I don't agree that AlphaGo was something that sounded a death knell in the ear's of Go players. Most of us already realised a long time ago that we were not going to become pro, that we were not, by playing, walking into some mystical transmogrification of utopia. I guess a few people were put off, but equally weren't a lot of people turned on? Computery types enjoy the new tools, geeks and nerds around the world visiting go sites because they were interested with the whole AlphaGo thing. How come they weren't, in some tiny degree, hooked into playing?

M.Lim wasn't the only one who described Go as a drug.

_________________
North Lecale

Nice rant, but that's a question of what went wrong with LifeIn19x19. Fewer people around, fewer people discussing the game. You're an admin, ignore the problem or call it out and pretend it is the fault of the users.

_________________
North Lecale

As another data point, I returned to go because of AlphaGo after a lifetime of checking in on it every once in a while. I'm still going strong two and a half years later and have been taking it seriously enough to play in the AYD for the last four seasons. I love being able to analyze games with tools such as Lizzie. I'm going to my first Go Congress in a few days and am pretty excited about it.

I don't know whether there are more dfans or more Kirbys out there. Ideally there would be a place for all of us.

Chill out people, it is just summer in some parts of this planet

According to Javaness2, UK membership peaked in 2003. For some reason, the European Go Database shows a peak for UK in 2008. The graph below shows that Russia managed to develop go well after that.

I am so sad no politics in this forum.

I would have some hints for the decline in UK and incline in Russia

Dont bother. I will not cross the line

If you want to increase the number of players I would recommend ...

some forms of advertisement:


Start Go clubs in schools,

Show Go during public events,

Put up flyers for your Go club at the universities,

...

(And dont overestimate the AlphaGo effect. What was the effect of Deep Blue on Chess followership?)

Probably he was counting BGA members whilst you are counting EGF ranked players from the UK. These two groups will have considerable overlap, but some will be in one and not the other.

That's a shame. Am I right in thinking this is largely because you have fallen out of love with go (in large part due to arrival of strong go bots) and not because you think, were you mentally in the same place as a few years ago, the congress will be worse now than before? Or does the fact Andy Liu and Ryan Li will play an AI pair go game, or during a lecture they might talk about AI inspired moves like early 3-3 invasions, or your opponents play such moves actively turn you off?

I just restarted studying and playing Go after a long break. I have to admit that Alpha Go`s win`s against Lee Sedol and Fan Hui unconsciously demotivated me... although it took me some time to accept that.

But... actually it is not that significant for my love / appreciation of the game. Compare to other sports: running, lifting weight etc. the fact that a machine can climb a mountain much faster or can easily lift tons of weight... or speaking about more abstract things... can calculate complex math-tasks in milliseconds, does not make it less interesting when people training to lift weight or try to calculate without the help of a calculator.

The game itself never changed, it is still alternating black and white moves on the boards, there are only now some stronger players around.

But yes, coming back to the topic... Alpha Go`s win was generally perceived as a demystification of GO, bringing it down to hard facts, wich are able to be calculated. No more esoteric mystery here. Edit: That is not a big marketing clue: "hey we have something here wich was regarded as beyond computer knowledge, but it is not ... but it is cool!"

When i started with Go, i did liked to think of GO, as being complex like playing 4 or 5 Chess games on one big board, you have a lot tactical battles on the board going on, and at the same time you should make some strategical decisions how to let the battle-fields - kind of - work together.

Even while i like Go more, i like to play chess a lot. I have no problems with the fact, that computers are better at it.

To make a much to long story short:
I think i was sad when Alpha Go won because it proved that Go is like Chess, not a mysterious / esoteric game, and some unconscious part of me did like to think of GO as something mysterious/spiritual beyond pure logic.

But now, after i accept that GO is in fact nothing more than logic, i`m fine with it.

Ah, and here is a related interview:
"Ke Jie wants you to know weiqi is fun -- and easy to learn"
https://youtu.be/OCevCII1zo0

_________________
“Play where you want and don’t be afraid. If you’re chasing the dream you must take the risk.” Yasumasa Hane 9p

Thanks for the link to the likeable interview.

I for one welcome the proliferation of go wisdom by AI. I like the demystification of the local go bullies as well

The interest in go seems to be steadily declining - why should AlphaGo change that? People who were interested in go before AG are probably mostly still interested -excepting those who have died or become senile, and those who were prompted by AG to give go a try were probably quickly discouraged. In these click and swipe times, with no hope of ever being the best, it's not surprising that so few want to embark on such an arduous journey. AlphaGo just makes go all the more daunting.

_________________
Patience, grasshopper.

To my eyes, chess is more popular now than it was 20 years ago, even in these click and swipe times. So I would not give up all hope just yet.

What happened in 1975 to about double the membership?

AlphaGo has as much to do with L19 as it does with UK membership.



What problem? People are just interested in chatting about other stuff, now.

_________________
be immersed

I don't have any reason to believe the congress will be worse now than before. The organizers seem to have been doing a lot of work. There's even an app, text message notification of pairings, and several other things that have never been done before at other congresses. I guess I'd be turned off by too much AI related discussion, but I didn't really assume that'd be the case. Just less interested in go, overall. Maybe I'll change my mind later.

I still like it enough to be checking L19, after all

_________________
be immersed