thank you for reminding me that i should have stated at the outset that the study problem this thread is about, was not and is not written for old hacks, but primarily for people fairly new to Go, and oldies (like me) who never really got the hang of the game, but still live in hope of being able to see a bit more clearly -Knotwilg wrote:Dont assume all are [new]
so even if you have only just learned the rules, it is my intention that you should be able to get something out of my explanation of the author's explanation - which, when it eventually comes, will fill in a few gaps the problem author's own explanation takes for granted, in the hope of making it comprehensible to everyone.
Go is a bit like Rubick's Cube, in that it is at one and the same time, very simple and impossibly complex. But it is also unlike Rubick's Cube, in that you don't need to know everything to get anywhere, so, like tiddley-winks or croquet, you can enjoy it even if you know hardly anything at all about it.
I am aiming to explain in everyday language what i mean by that seemingly self-contradictory statement when it comes to putting together and taking apart all the different answers that people of a fairly wide range of abilities have put forward, in the light of the problem author's own answer and explanation of it.
black to play
this problem comes from a book; if you know the author's answer, please don't spoil it for others by telling