Hi,
I think this exercise in "baduk for beginners" (Kim Sung-rae) (p 140, Spanish edition) is not correct:
Black moves: Find the movement that creates seki:
And the provided solution is:
But I can't see the solution at all... I mean, then White can end up with two eyes? :
May be the diagram is incorrect in this edition?
I tried also with the stone at D1 changed to black, but then Black always win with B2, so no seki - for example (if White doesn't play inside, Black C1 will win):
Anyone has this book and can search for the forth exercise in chapter "4.8 Seki" ?
Any help is welcome, thanks
question about seki exercise in go book
-
senetsomed
- Beginner
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:50 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 2 times
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
senetsomed
- Beginner
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:50 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: question about seki exercise in go book
Thanks Uberdude, you're right, it seems the most plausible "patch".
I think I didn't find it, because it is kind of a seki with cycle, because after black B2,
white can play A1, forcing black to play C1 capturing, forcing white to play A2 to capture A3,
returning then to the position after the initial black B2.
I don't know if this makes this a "proper" seki, because couldn't this sequence be interlaced with other intermediate plays maybe "losing" this seki? May be this is usual with seki's as it is with ko's?
I do not know: I am still at the middle of this beginners' book
I think I didn't find it, because it is kind of a seki with cycle, because after black B2,
white can play A1, forcing black to play C1 capturing, forcing white to play A2 to capture A3,
returning then to the position after the initial black B2.
I don't know if this makes this a "proper" seki, because couldn't this sequence be interlaced with other intermediate plays maybe "losing" this seki? May be this is usual with seki's as it is with ko's?
I do not know: I am still at the middle of this beginners' book
-
Pio2001
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:13 pm
- Rank: kgs 5 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Pio2001
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: question about seki exercise in go book
Right !Uberdude wrote:My guess is there is the following stone missing:
In the English edition, page 148 (4th problem of the chapter about seki), this stone is indeed present.
Anyway, you are lucky to have this excellent book translated in your language. Its only weakness is the introduction to the principle of two eyes, that is confusing.
-
senetsomed
- Beginner
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:50 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: question about seki exercise in go book
thank you very much Pio2001 for the material confirmation!
So, it is a "proper" seki, even having a "cycle" of mutual attack and defense in it?
PS:
Yeah, the book is good: with it I'm starting to understand the game after various previous unfruitful attempts
So, it is a "proper" seki, even having a "cycle" of mutual attack and defense in it?
PS:
Yeah, the book is good: with it I'm starting to understand the game after various previous unfruitful attempts
-
Pio2001
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:13 pm
- Rank: kgs 5 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Pio2001
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: question about seki exercise in go book
Yes, becausesenetsomed wrote:So, it is a "proper" seki, even having a "cycle" of mutual attack and defense in it?
-White can't kill Black
-Black can't kill White
...and in the end, we don't know whose territory are the intersections between the black and white stones. They are thus considered as a "neutral zone".
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: question about seki exercise in go book
Depends on what you mean by proper.senetsomed wrote:So, it is a "proper" seki, even having a "cycle" of mutual attack and defense in it?
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
senetsomed
- Beginner
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:50 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: question about seki exercise in go book
Thanks for the answers !
I didn't know about the AGA rules... it is very interesting that "Repeated Board Position" rule...
I have tooooo much to learn
I didn't know about the AGA rules... it is very interesting that "Repeated Board Position" rule...
I have tooooo much to learn