CarlJung, Li Kao and topazg
Welcome you attending this forum.CarlJung
CarlJung wrote:Woah, you're still using Visual C++ 6.0?
(that's what PEiD says at least)
You know too much of my secret
. Actually I am surviving hard in mechanical engineering, and no programming professionals wanted to help me this job with the latest tools -you might know why-. And, one more, there is no clearly established theory yet as far as I know. That’s why I still stick on the old stuff that I have learned in ice age. May be I should continue with this until something come up. CarlJung, Li Kao, topazg and freegame
Appreciate your opinion and suggestion regarding the issue of influence factor.
As a user of Go programs in this community, I also fully agree with you in that an analytical result should be “Accurate and Reasonable” for an intended purpose, and I’d like to say it was my motivation of this project.
I am, at current stage, working on some tools that could provide useful information such as “stability of stone group”,” life and dead” and so on. The detail algorithm of “my own” theory for this has not been clearly/completely established yet, but I would say I do some experiments like “right now” status analysis, liberty consideration as you said.
By the feedback in this forum, I think that I should provide analysis tools and options for you soon.
Thanks,
