Firstly, from separate earlier studies, we know (probable) perfect komi for smaller sizes:
Code: Select all
SZ Japanese Chinese
3 8 9
4 0 2
5 24 25
6 3 4Code: Select all
SZ Japanese Chinese
3 8 9
4 0 2
5 24 25
6 3 4Code: Select all
SZ Japanese Chinese
7 8 9
KataGo is pretty sure about both values, to such a degree that although formal proof is vastly beyond reach, these are probably decent guesses for the perfect komi.
8 9-* 10-*
KataGo thinks these values are fair, and is *very* confident that it is not higher. But as for being lower... white has high-variance tactics that KataGo thinks probably don't work, but if they do, could push the perfect komi much lower, even by multiple points. The incredible asymmetry between higher komi confidence vs lower komi confidence is fascinating.
9 6- 7--
These are the most fair, but KataGo thinks white is at least slightly easier to play in each case, especially in Chinese.
10 6- 6++
Japanese: White is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: Black is easier to play.
11 6- 5.5,6,6.5+
Japanese: White is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: No seki is expected, unclear if perfect komi is 5 or 7, so fairest komi in practice is in between, but more likely to be 7, so black is slightly easier to play. (7 is less fair in practice because even if the most likely perfect komi, it's so much harder for black to play than 5.5,6,6.5 are for white to play).
12 6 6.5,7,7.5--
Japanese: Pretty much fair in practice.
Chinese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 8, enough that fairest komi in practice is in between, but more likely to be 6, so in between is easier for white to play.
13 6+ 7-
Japanese: Black is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: White is slightly easier to play.
14 6+ 6.5,7,7.5-
Japanese: Black is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 8, enough that fairest komi in practice is in between, but more likely to be 6, so in between is slightly easier for white to play.
15 6.5- 7-
Japanese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 7, enough that fairest komi in practice is 6.5, but more likely 6, so white is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: White is slightly easier to play.
16 6.5- 6.5,7,7.5-
Japanese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 7, enough that fairest komi in practice is 6.5, but more likely 6, so white is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 8, so fairest komi in practice is in between, but more likely to be 6, so in between is slightly easier for white to play.
17 6.5- 7-
Japanese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 7, enough that fairest komi in practice is 6.5, but more likely 6, so white is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: White is slightly easier to play.
18 6.5- 6.5,7,7.5
Japanese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 7, enough that fairest komi in practice is 6.5, but more likely 6, so white is slightly easier to play.
Chinese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 8, so fairest komi in practice is in between.
19 6.5 7
Japanese: Unclear if perfect komi is 6 or 7, enough that fairest komi in practice is 6.5.
Chinese: Pretty much fair in practice.Code: Select all
SZ\KM 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10. 10.5
7J 99 50 3
8J 95 94 93 91 89 89 90 85 84 50 2
9J 89 84 80 70 48 26 17 13
10J 87 82 77 70 60 47 32 22 16
11J 76 68 59 48 37 28 22
12J 67 59 51 42 35 28
13J 67 59 52 45 38 31
14J 65 59 52 46 40 34
15J 65 60 54 48 42 37
16J 63 58 53 48 43 38
17J 57 52 48 44 39
18J 56 53 49 45 41
19J 56 52 49 45 42
Code: Select all
SZ\KM 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10. 10.5
7C 99 50 2
8C 95 92 89 88 90 79 79 80 85 50 1
9C 93 83 69 69 70 41 13 17 16 12 8
10C 93 85 76 75 77 60 31 34 32 18 7
11C 85 74 59 59 59 39 21
12C 73 59 41 43 42 29 18
13C 83 72 59 59 60 45 31
14C 71 60 45 46 46 34 23
15C 78 69 59 59 60 48 37
16C 68 58 47 48 49 39 30
17C 74 65 56 57 57 48 39
18C 65 56 48 48 49 41 33
19C 70 63 55 56 56 49 41
Code: Select all
SZ\KM 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10. 10.5
7J 99 50 3
7C 99 50 2
8J 95 94 93 91 89 89 90 85 84 50 2
8C 95 92 89 88 90 79 79 80 85 50 1
9J 89 84 80 70 48 26 17 13
9C 93 83 69 69 70 41 13 17 16 12 8
10J 87 82 77 70 60 47 32 22 16
10C 93 85 76 75 77 60 31 34 32 18 7
11J 76 68 59 48 37 28 22
11C 85 74 59 59 59 39 21
12J 67 59 51 42 35 28
12C 73 59 41 43 42 29 18
13J 67 59 52 45 38 31
13C 83 72 59 59 60 45 31
14J 65 59 52 46 40 34
14C 71 60 45 46 46 34 23
15J 65 60 54 48 42 37
15C 78 69 59 59 60 48 37
16J 63 58 53 48 43 38
16C 68 58 47 48 49 39 30
17J 57 52 48 44 39
17C 74 65 56 57 57 48 39
18J 56 53 49 45 41
18C 65 56 48 48 49 41 33
19J 56 52 49 45 42
19C 70 63 55 56 56 49 41
With area scoring rules, you have 361 pts to share, so if there's no seki, the score difference on the board is always an odd integer (If black score on the board is B, and white score on the board is B, then W+B=361)Evidence is mounting that 7.5 komi, as commonly used with Chinese rules (and AGA rules), is too much.
Does anyone know if there are plans in China or the US to lower the komi to 6.5?
Well, why not a komi of 7 points? Even pros would probably have ties less than 5% of the time. Chess gets by with a fairly high rate of draws.gennan wrote:Yes, the lower graph also shows that 5.5 and 6.5 komi have basically the same winrate with Chinese rules.
But black has 55% winrate with 5.5 or 6.5 komi, while white has 60% winrate with 7.5 komi. So 7.5 komi seems to be more unfair than 5.5 or 6.5 komi.
KataGo supports area scoring + button Go as an evaluation method. I have not studied what its evaluations are or how they differ from those here (I suspect they would largely match the Japanese rules evaluations, but I haven't checked). I welcome anyone to do their own study.Bill Spight wrote: I still like Button Go, though.
Generally KataGo played easily 10x (order of magnitudewise) as many 19x19 games as any other board size. But also smaller boards are easier to learn - whereas if you only a have a few GPUs it takes weeks or months to reach pro level on 19x19 for example, I think it could be done on 9x9 in days. Also an enormous amount of knowledge generalizes between the board sizes, especially on the larger sizes. You can see this in the smoothness of the winrate estimates for the larger board sizes. If it were systematically the case that smaller board size play were abnormally "lower-quality" by a lot than the 19x19 play, you'd expect that empirically in self-play a given degree of komi-unfairness would not result in as pronounced an advantage for one side or the other, and then the neural net's output would reflect those statistics (fitting smooth-ish simple curves to statistics is very easy for neural nets), so you might expect a discontinuity in the sharpness of the winrates as you go from 19x19 to any smaller size. But to the contrary it looks quite regularly increasing in sharpness, as you'd expect if quality of play was fairly regular and the dominant effect was simply the higher variance of the large board due to the board being bigger / games lasting longer, given comparably high-quality play.ez4u wrote:@lightvector
How much experience did katago have at the different komi levels/rule sets on different boards? I assume that the katago should be weaker at assessing the alternatives simply due to the difference in experience levels. It would be extremely interesting to see your thoughts in this regard.