Javaness2 wrote:
As suspected, not all plain sailing. I saw one player had to withdraw, and one other player complain about scheduling.
I'm not sure that there is really an easy solution to implement, but it doesn't feel entirely fair to all the participants to have such a system. Maybe the IGF could have asked to have trusted referees in other countries to add additional time slots.
Did someone withdraw after the tournament began? It is not clear from that webpage that anyone did.
It is possible to organize a flexible online tournament but you need everyone to have flexibility, the players and the observers, not only the observers

The organization of the online KPMCs was rather flexible and even had side events. The previous mixed online-offline WAGC had a time for the mixed games but I think I remember that there was flexibility with the online games.
This tournament isn't organized by the IGF. In the IGF the presidency is rotated every year and this seems to happen even if there is no AGM but this isn't much different from having AGM without any proper votes on anything important anyway. Typically the country with the presidency organizes the WAGC, unless it has been agreed to reschedule (i.e. allow a 4th country to hold it or to align with some big sports event taking place in one of the usual three). Now there is a Chinese presidency and they are organizing the WAGC tournament.
The invites were sent with a short notice, they were sent to Russia and Belarus, there wasn't a clear tournament schedule, and once it was clear neither of Russia and Belarus were registering it was only possible to extend the deadline for one day before the tournament start date. The combination of all of this is that it is the smallest WAGC since 1995 which had 44 players from 48 member countries, this year we have 45 from 77 member countries.
It is what it is.