[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . . . . $$ | . . O X . . . . . . $$ | . O X X . O . . . X $$ | c 3 O . X O . . . . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . . . . $$ | . b . . . . . . . . $$ +---------------------[/go]
W4@b next is refuted in the book. W4@c is refuted by B5@a ( I think ). But what about W4@a?
My guess:
$$cW4@a,W6@b,B7@c $$ | . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . . . . $$ | d O X . . . . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . . . . $$ | 0 . O X . . . . . . $$ | 8 O X X . O . . . X $$ | 5 3 O . X O . . . . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . . . . $$ | 7 b 9 e f . . . . . $$ +---------------------
[go]$$cW4@a,W6@b,B7@c $$ | . . . . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . . . . $$ | d O X . . . . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . . . . $$ | 0 . O X . . . . . . $$ | 8 O X X . O . . . X $$ | 5 3 O . X O . . . . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . . . . $$ | 7 b 9 e f . . . . . $$ +---------------------[/go]
W4@a,W6@b B11@d next will give B his not so one sided ko in which he needs the first threat.
It took me some time to digest. But here is what I learnt: The solutions of the book, of Cassandra and of zinger all leads to ko with Black capturing first. They are all three ( equally) good refutations for W's blocking move @2. W shouldn't risk ko for some yosepoints.
book's refutation:
$$cW6 cannot be at a. $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 6 a O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 4 . . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$cW6 cannot be at a. $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 6 a O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 4 . . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
Cassandra:
$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 0 . O X . . . $$ | 9 O X X . O . $$ | 5 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | 7 6 8 . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 0 . O X . . . $$ | 9 O X X . O . $$ | 5 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | 7 6 8 . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
Zinger:
$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 8 . O X . . . $$ | 7 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 5 6 . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 8 . O X . . . $$ | 7 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 5 6 . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
cyclops wrote:It took me some time to digest. But here is what I learnt: The solutions of the book, of Cassandra and of zinger all leads to ko with Black capturing first. They are all three ( equally) good refutations for W's blocking move @2. W shouldn't risk ko for some yosepoints.
book's refutation:
$$cW6 cannot be at a. $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 6 a O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 4 . . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$cW6 cannot be at a. $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 6 a O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 4 . . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
Cassandra:
$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 0 . O X . . . $$ | 9 O X X . O . $$ | 5 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | 7 6 8 . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 0 . O X . . . $$ | 9 O X X . O . $$ | 5 3 O . X O . $$ | . 1 2 . X . . $$ | 7 6 8 . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
Zinger:
$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 8 . O X . . . $$ | 7 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 5 6 . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | 8 . O X . . . $$ | 7 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 5 6 . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
One of these things is not like the other...
"Zinger's" diagram above is not a solution - white will connect with 8.
"Zinger's" diagram above is not a solution - white will connect with 8.
True enough. But what I meant was:
$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . . O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . . . . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . . O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . . . . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
Main Entry: zing·er Pronunciation: \ˈziŋ-ər\
1 : something causing or meant to cause interest, surprise, or shock
2 : a pointed witty remark or retort
"Zinger's" diagram above is not a solution - white will connect with 8.
True enough. But what I meant was:
$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . . O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . . . . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$c $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . . O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | . 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . . . . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
That's why I put your name in quotes instead of just saying "Zinger's diagram." He had it labeled as yours but it wasn't.
He (cyclops) apologizes for misusing Zingers name. Don't know how he got so confused. But then his (Z's) true move (B5 ) is suboptimal because W gets to make the first ko capture.
$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . $$ | 9 8 0 . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . $$ | 9 8 0 . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
( W7@8 -> B8@10 : threatens fatal atari next @7 or above 5) Or maybe cyclops is myopic beyond repair?
BTW, the initial position is discussed also in "Basic Techniques of Go" by Haruyama & Nagahara ( Ch 5, dia 43, p 101 ).
cyclops wrote:He (cyclops) apologizes for misusing Zingers name. Don't know how he got so confused. But then his (Z's) true move (B5 ) is suboptimal because W gets to make the first ko capture.
$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . $$ | 9 8 0 . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | a 1 2 . X . . $$ | 9 8 0 . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
( W7@8 -> B8@10 : threatens fatal atari next @7 or above 5) Or maybe cyclops is myopic beyond repair?
BTW, the initial position is discussed also in "Basic Techniques of Go" by Haruyama & Nagahara ( Ch 5, dia 43, p 101 ).
Haha, sorry - ethanb has a hard time judging what's polite in terms of pronouns in a forum like this. Better to use names.
But 9 can be a hane on the outside, then white will have to throw in to start the ko (so black captures first anyway, as well as making it a direct ko rather than approach-move.)
$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 8 . . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 8 . . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
ethanb wrote:Haha, sorry - ethanb has a hard time judging what's polite in terms of pronouns in a forum like this. Better to use names.
But 9 can be a hane on the outside, then white will have to throw in to start the ko (so black captures first anyway, as well as making it a direct ko rather than approach-move.)
No need to say sorry; Cyclops was not offended. I am confused about your last remark. W8 is an atari and B has no choice but to play in the very corner. Or do we talk different diagrams?
$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 8 . . . . . $$ +---------------
[go]$$cW4@a $$ | . . . . . . . $$ | . X X . . . . $$ | . O X . . . . $$ | . O O X . . . $$ | . 6 O X . . . $$ | 5 O X X . O . $$ | 7 3 O . X O . $$ | 4 1 2 . X . . $$ | . 8 . . . . . $$ +---------------[/go]
ethanb wrote:Haha, sorry - ethanb has a hard time judging what's polite in terms of pronouns in a forum like this. Better to use names.
But 9 can be a hane on the outside, then white will have to throw in to start the ko (so black captures first anyway, as well as making it a direct ko rather than approach-move.)
No need to say sorry; Cyclops was not offended. I am confused about your last remark. W8 is an atari and B has no choice but to play in the very corner. Or do we talk different diagrams?
We talk late in the evening, I think - I forgot that a marked a stone earlier.