hyperpape wrote:Hazushi wrote:Yea Im off abit, I was thinking of Epistemology which is the philosophy theory of knowledge....
No, you're not. The whole discussion is about knowledge, Monadology was just claiming that perhaps we can't generalize about knowledge, because there are fundamentally different kinds of knowledge--scientific, aesthetic, and whatever other categories there might be.
Meaning of what I said seems to be off. I ment that I was off a bit by the meaning of aesthetic, but I understood what Monadology meat about the fundamentally different kinds.