It is currently Tue May 20, 2025 3:17 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #21 Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:53 am 
Tengen
User avatar

Posts: 4511
Location: Chatteris, UK
Liked others: 1589
Was liked: 656
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Monadology wrote:
Because the 3-3 gives the person performing the 3-3 invasion less of the overall points being competed for on the board, whereas the outwardly facing influence has an effect on a larger part of the board. The law of diminishing returns applies, of course. But it is still the case that the advantage influence nets you in a running battle will be slightly larger because there is a larger portion of the board in which to take profit as you attack your opponent. The way in which influence is optimally taken on a larger board probably involves lighter and less concentrated play with an aim towards preventing invading groups from stabilizing and would probably be more difficult only because it would require much more extensive reading and counting. That doesn't mean it is an inherently suboptimal strategy, though.

Basically, I think where we differ is in the view that influence is worth the same amount on every board.


The influence is not worth the same amount on every board, but nor does it get steadily bigger on bigger boards. Schilds answered it nicely, and between his and Bill's posts there are good explanations of why that isn't the case. Big boards are funky :P

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #22 Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:10 pm 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 97
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 12
Rank: 3k
flOv, those three pictures do not have easily compared formations. The walls on the 19x19 board (and smaller) have extensions, on the larger board they do not. Even just changing the distance between the walls means they are not the same formation. Naturally, there will be more space for the opponent to play in if you don't make an extension from your wall, or the walls are further apart. In order to only account for change in board size, you either have to keep the formations the same, or first show that the change in formation has no significant effect on the specific relationship we're interested in.

If it illustrates anything about the values of particular moves, it illustrates that the middle star point on a smaller board has a better relationship with its corners than does the middle star point on a larger board.

What it does not illustrate is that the size of the board changes the value one player gets out of a particular formation with respect to the value the other player gets out of it.

I think that all we need in order to do so is (as I've already suggested) take a wall on a smaller board, put the exact same wall on a larger board and then ask if we were to play near the wall, would we (all else being equal) play any closer to or further from it on the larger board than on the smaller board. My feeling is that the answer is no, and that we could conclude that the value gained by one player on one side of the wall with respect to the value gained by the other player on the other side of the wall doesn't change.

_________________
19/02/2011: this grumpy person takes a voluntary holiday from L19.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #23 Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:31 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 97
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 12
Rank: 3k
Here's a question that I think is pertinent to our discussion. Which pair is most similar? Which is the least?

A)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ 19x19
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ 23x23
$$ +-----------------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . , . . . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


B)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ 19x19
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ 23x23
$$ +-----------------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . X . . . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]


C)
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ 19x19
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . X . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ 13x13
$$ +---------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . , . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]

_________________
19/02/2011: this grumpy person takes a voluntary holiday from L19.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #24 Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:24 am 
Lives with ko
User avatar

Posts: 295
Location: Linz, Austria
Liked others: 21
Was liked: 44
Rank: EGF 4 kyu
GD Posts: 627
schilds wrote:
flOv, those three pictures do not have easily compared formations. The walls on the 19x19 board (and smaller) have extensions, on the larger board they do not. Even just changing the distance between the walls means they are not the same formation. Naturally, there will be more space for the opponent to play in if you don't make an extension from your wall, or the walls are further apart. In order to only account for change in board size, you either have to keep the formations the same, or first show that the change in formation has no significant effect on the specific relationship we're interested in.


I think I have already answered that. See my other post ;)

schilds wrote:
I think that all we need in order to do so is (as I've already suggested) take a wall on a smaller board, put the exact same wall on a larger board and then ask if we were to play near the wall, would we (all else being equal) play any closer to or further from it on the larger board than on the smaller board. My feeling is that the answer is no, and that we could conclude that the value gained by one player on one side of the wall with respect to the value gained by the other player on the other side of the wall doesn't change.


Again, you got your reasoning the wrong way round. On a smaller board, I *can't* play as far from the wall as I want. I *have to* play closer, because there is not enough space. Then the opponent can attack and profit from the wall. On a larger board, I can play farther from the wall, the opponent can attack less severely or not at all, so the return from the wall is less.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #25 Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:31 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 97
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 12
Rank: 3k
Seems like we'll have to agree to disagree.

_________________
19/02/2011: this grumpy person takes a voluntary holiday from L19.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #26 Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:48 pm 
Dies in gote
User avatar

Posts: 60
Liked others: 42
Was liked: 5
Araban wrote:
Sano wrote:
I was just wondering if anyone here has tried to play on boards bigger than 19x19.
If you're beerslayer, 37x37 is standard.


I enjoy going over ones that end within single digit difference. beerslayer said he had one end at 0.5 once! Though he didn't know where the game was. Don't suppose you can search for games with margin of score difference as a criteria on KGS, but it would be fun to see that game.

Was thinking it would also be fun to post the finishing position of one of his close games in this thread but I don't know how you would do it? (know I couldn't do it with Drago because it doesn't recognize 37x37's).

_________________
Where've you been? Zatoichi could slice the board in half, put it back together again and rearrange the position so fast that no-one even knew he'd drawn his sword - and he was blind. ~ John Fairbairn

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #27 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:48 pm 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 97
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 12
Rank: 3k
Attachment:
IstvanV-beerslayer_1.png
IstvanV-beerslayer_1.png [ 64.36 KiB | Viewed 5084 times ]

White wins by 7.5

(courtesy of usagi mentioning gowrite2 in another thread ;))

_________________
19/02/2011: this grumpy person takes a voluntary holiday from L19.


This post by schilds was liked by 3 people: Gresil, jdl, sixko
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #28 Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:28 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 156
Liked others: 117
Was liked: 31
Rank: KGS 4 kyu
KGS: Bray
Where can you play 37x37? I tried to start one on KGS, but it wouldn't let me choose a board size larger than 19x19.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #29 Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:30 am 
Dies with sente
User avatar

Posts: 97
Liked others: 2
Was liked: 12
Rank: 3k
You can type the size into the box.

_________________
19/02/2011: this grumpy person takes a voluntary holiday from L19.


This post by schilds was liked by: jdl
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Playing in 21x21 or bigger
Post #30 Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:56 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2777
Location: Seattle, WA
Liked others: 251
Was liked: 549
KGS: oren
Tygem: oren740, orenl
IGS: oren
Wbaduk: oren
jdl wrote:
Where can you play 37x37? I tried to start one on KGS, but it wouldn't let me choose a board size larger than 19x19.


You have to make sure you're not on rated game.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group