Comparing go to chess

General conversations about Go belong here.
User avatar
Redbeard
Lives with ko
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:56 am
Rank: AGA 12k
GD Posts: 292
KGS: RedBeard
DGS: Akahige
Location: Seattle
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 123 times
Contact:

Re: Comparing go to chess

Post by Redbeard »

Marcus wrote:
jts wrote:These aren't players who want to study and learn the game ... they just want to play. They don't care about evening the odds with handicaps, or reducing their handicap ... they want to play the game "the way it should be played" without handicap. They then get frustrated and play the game less and less until they stop because they find the game "boring and repetitive".

Interesting, that's the reverse of what I find. Beginners always seem delighted the handicap system means they have a decent chance of beating me, despite my knowing the game much better than they.

I've seen this both ways. This is also why many beginners are hesitant to play on boards smaller than 19x19. They think that the smaller boards are not "proper Go". I usually get around this by explaining that different board sizes and handicaps ARE proper ways to play the game and stressing that they are not playing a "kiddie" version of Go with a 13x13 board and 5 stone handicap.
Last edited by Redbeard on Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Fedya
Lives in gote
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:21 pm
Rank: 6-7k KGS
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 139 times

Re: Comparing go to chess

Post by Fedya »

Which game is more subtle and complex?

Bridge is more complex: it's not a game of complete information. :D
Post Reply