Koffein wrote:SoDesuNe wrote:You can't make good money with Go, so why should the price-money only be awarded to strong european players (even those european pros), who are still weak when it comes to a competition with asian amateurs(!)?
Those "weak european players" won´t go back to East Asia, they stay in Europe to teach and promote Go. All of them already spent hundreds and thousands of hours to promote Go, so it´s only fair they get some money to be able to continue their work. If they can´t win money, they won´t be able to attend many tournaments, so they have no chance to compete at all and probably switch to <insert random game here>
That's life. Professionals contact tournament organisers and arrange fees to come and do teaching weekends and evenings and the like. If strong Europeans want to do this alongside an event, more power to them - I'd certainly be very happy if part of my entry fee went to a strong player offering teaching, even at cost. It seems a very appropriate thing for the money to go towards. However, prizes should go to the winner. If they are strong enough, they can get the prizes, if they aren't, they don't.
Koffein wrote:topazg wrote:I can't express how happy I was to sit there on EuroGoTV watching the top two boards of a European tournament, consisting of 3 professionals and strong Korean ex-insei.
I can´t express how sad i was to sit there on EuroGoTV watching a big european tournament and not being able to see Europeans at all.
I agree that this is sad. However, that's not the fault of allowing non-Europeans to play, it's a problem that Europeans aren't strong enough. If I'm a big fan of a snooker or tennis player that happens to be outside of the top 100, I could be really unhappy that I don't get to watch them when the sport happens to be on the TV, or I could accept that they aren't strong enough to get to the televised rounds.
Frankly, I would like to see this whole "I want to see Europeans" thing disappear, it really feels somewhat racist. I don't care if the top boards are black, white, Korean, German, Argentinian, male, female, 75 years old, 10 years old, disabled, or whatever. What I want to see is really really strong Go players. The French Open had that in abundance, and I thought it was fantastic. Sure, if we had 4 Europeans on the top board that were playing even stronger than all the pros that would be awesome (in fact, probably more awesome as it would hint that the Go scene over here is finally getting really truly strong), but it wasn't the case. As it was, I was delighted that we could boast so much GoR 2750 talent on display. Congratulations to the organisers for making it happen.
On that note, I would like to speak out for the unsung heroes in this thread that I personally think deserve the money as much as any strong players: namely, the organisers, the event promoters, and the administrators of all these great tournaments I get the pleasure to attend. If my money and fee (I expect to bear a financial burden when visiting an event, and would still expect to have to if I became a lot stronger) go towards making sure the event runs smoothly and more events happen in the future, I will remain very happy. If it costs a bit more because they are also intending on having someone particularly strong attend the event and do a simul and/or a lecture or two, I'll make the most of the added value and enjoy those too.