Thanks, Kirby!Kirby wrote:What web browser are you using? If there's a problem with the diagrams, I can investigate it, provided I can reproduce the issue.Bill Spight wrote:Why am I seeing no diagrams in this thread?
Local problem solved.
Thanks, Kirby!Kirby wrote:What web browser are you using? If there's a problem with the diagrams, I can investigate it, provided I can reproduce the issue.Bill Spight wrote:Why am I seeing no diagrams in this thread?
I'm not sure that even Araban's defense is adequate, at least not from the most recent diagram:Kirby wrote:I think the others are correct that you should try to avoid the situation in the first place. But if you did get into the situation, I think that Araban's answer is good:...
But at least you've cut him off from going "further south": ...
Don't think yours is not any better:Joaz Banbeck wrote:I'm not sure that even Araban's defense is adequate, at least not from the most recent diagram:Kirby wrote:I think the others are correct that you should try to avoid the situation in the first place. But if you did get into the situation, I think that Araban's answer is good:...
But at least you've cut him off from going "further south": ...
My current favorite for minimizing loss is this:
Can anyone else do better?
Note to OP: I think that Kirby's "back up until you can build a defence" theory does have merit, even if it does not generate optimal play in this particular situation.
It is not quite that simple, for black destroys 10-12 points and then exits with sente, so white really only gets one uncontested move elsewhere.yawnguy wrote:Unless I'm missing something (not hard to do at my level!), it looks like White is getting to play two moves elsewhere while Black is sneaking in, and loses only 10 or 12 points as a result, assuming he doesn't really screw it up.
Wouldn't that generally be a good trade, except for fairly near the end of the game?...