Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Post Reply
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6273
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

Post by RobertJasiek »

It is generally assumed to be a truth that monolithic center nakade
eyes of size greater than 7 do not exist. Has this been proven?!
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

Post by hyperpape »

What does monolithic mean? Those formed by string connected groups, surely, but what else?
User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2664
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 634 times

Re: Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

Post by jts »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Corner
$$ . . . . X . X . . . .
$$ . . X . X . X . X . .
$$ . . X . O X O . X . .
$$ . . . . O X O . . . .
$$ . X X O O X O O X X .
$$ . . O X X X X X O . .
$$ . X X O O X O O X X .
$$ . . . O O X O O . . .
$$ . . X . X O X . X . .
$$ . . . . X . X . . . .[/go]


It would have to be a proof for larger than 10 (unless "monolithic" means something technical)
User avatar
daniel_the_smith
Gosei
Posts: 2116
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Location: Silicon Valley
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 330 times
Contact:

Re: Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

Post by daniel_the_smith »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B One bigger?
$$ . . . . X . X . . . .
$$ . . X . X . X . X . .
$$ . . X . O X O . X . .
$$ . . . O O X O . . . .
$$ . X X O X X O O X X .
$$ . . O X X X X X O . .
$$ . X X O O X O O X X .
$$ . . . O O X O O . . .
$$ . . X . X O X . X . .
$$ . . . . X . X . . . .[/go]
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

Post by hyperpape »

I'm sure monolithic places some kind of restrictions, both because it's Robert, and because it's very common knowledge that seven spaces isn't enough if you have cutting points or ataris in place.

I'm betting it will require a somewhat ugly case analysis to prove.
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6273
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Re: Monolithic Center Nakade Eyes of Size Greater than 7?

Post by RobertJasiek »

In

"A library of eyes in Go, II: Monolithic eyes"

at

http://www.brocku.ca/mathematics-scienc ... ications#3

Thomas Wolf has introduced the term monolithic for "adjacent to only one [surrounding] string".

Now Erik van der Werf has provided a sketch of a proof in

<a37bb$4e7d13b4$d4bb4c13$17898@news.chello.nl>

at

https://groups.google.com/group/rec.gam ... dab1e3e4d0

with just a minor editing typo of one empty shape.
Post Reply