John Fairbairn wrote:You should be ashamed.
Why shoul I be ashamed when you are blatently unobjective?
The pairings are 8 Korean players vs. 8 Chinese players. You attempt to suggest that this is an attempt to bring in more domestic prize money.
1.) If they want to keep prize money domestic, they can have domestic tournaments.
2.) Assuming players of equal strength, there is no difference in chances for domestic advancement in any arrangement. Given 50% chance of win for each pro, the expected number of korean advancers is 4 of the 8. Any other arrangement is the same. The only way this arrangement increases korean advancement odds is if there is greater than 50% chance for korean pros to beat chinese pros when randomly matched.
Again, if you want domestic prize retention, have domestic tournaments.
I feel no reason to be ashamed when I feel information is not being presented objectively. I know you like the phrase "Mickey Mouse" time limits, and you know just as well that it offends me.
But this is a separate issue here. We are not discussing time limits.
P.S. You did claim to have sources behind your comments in an earlier discussion. Again, this is not true.
Anyway, I am totally confident in the points I have brought up, so I am going to bow out of this conversation, as I do not have time to pursue it further.