42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

User avatar
Magicwand
Tengen
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:26 am
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Magicwand »

daniel_the_smith wrote:Also not for players.
(At four stones I get completely and thoroughly crushed against the 7 dans, every time so far-- it makes me remember what it was like to be 10k again. I'm 2-0 vs the 5d owner at 2 stones, though.)


i've been tricked!!!
or i guess he was weak 5 dan :)
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson
User avatar
daniel_the_smith
Gosei
Posts: 2116
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Location: Silicon Valley
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 330 times
Contact:

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by daniel_the_smith »

@Magicwand

Don't worry, they're generous with the ratings there--they're at least one stone weaker than AGA ratings. The owner thinks I'm nearly 2d (I don't agree), I don't know why he handicaps me like I'm 3d. I think my strengths just happen to coincide with his weaknesses. That or he's just leading me on... ;) Plus I've been trying to improve lately, I would like to defend 1d at congress...
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Move 25
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O X . B . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O O . X . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . X O X . . . X , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . O . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]


The same plan, but delayed one move to get some extra liberties first. This threatens to connect with a monkey jump underneath.
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
Suji
Lives in gote
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 2:25 pm
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Sujisan 12 kyu
OGS: Sujisan 13 kyu
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Suji »

Not for the players:

Am I the only one who fears for black? I looks like Araban is getting exactly what he wants with the current exchange. I don't have any variations in mind, but surely black could have gotten a better result. What do the stronger players who aren't playing the game say?
My plan to become an SDK is here.
User avatar
Magicwand
Tengen
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:26 am
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Magicwand »

Suji wrote:Not for the players:

Am I the only one who fears for black? I looks like Araban is getting exactly what he wants with the current exchange. I don't have any variations in mind, but surely black could have gotten a better result. What do the stronger players who aren't playing the game say?

Joaz drew many many useless diag that will never happen...
i understand that he is working very hard to show all the variations...but too much of nothing doesnt really help.
anyway...if black connect two groups with monkey jump... in gote...while white gets influcence in sente... that is really bad for black.
yes i can see the rank difference between two players.
if i was black..i would not try to save that stone...
it is more effective to use them as aji for later.
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson
User avatar
Solomon
Gosei
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:21 pm
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Capsule 4d
Tygem: 치킨까스 5d
Location: Bellevue, WA
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 835 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Solomon »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Move 26
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O X . X . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O O . X . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . X O X . . . X , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . W O . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$c Move 26
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O X . X . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O O . X . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . X O X . . . X , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . a O b O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Warning: Bit longer than usual, will try to be more succinct next time.

So...it's the ultimate question: 'a' or 'b'? 'a' essentially surrenders N17 and gives Black roughly 10 points on top. However, the compensation is that it prevents Black playing there in sente and trailing a bit of aji. Furthermore, it is solid and if Black does try to take the stone (which is kind of like bait), then it will only strengthen my outside so I think it's worth less than 10 points. But let's just say it's worth 10 for the sake of discussion. So the question could perhaps be worded: "Should I give up ~10 points to prevent the sente atari from Black?".

I couldn't come to a truly definite conclusion on one or the other. Instead, I decided I was in favor of 'a' over 'b' by about 70%. So I decided to go on random.org and get a random number between 1 - 10. If it was 4 - 10, I would choose 'a', but if it was 1 - 3 I would choose 'b'. The result was :b9: , so I chose 'a'.

I think the question requires some pondering, so I hope observers think about this question and offer their thoughts and suggestions (either to each other, or to me :P), not only on their answer to this question but also whether they think the question is even correct to begin with! Is my choice too slow? Or is it solid? Is 'b' an overplay? Or is it efficient? These are the sort of questions I had to answer in my head before placing my stone down. I just hope I answered them correctly.

Also, I hope by this point you realized I was just joking about relying on a pseudo/"truly"-random generator to determine my move :). I will save my defense on why I chose 'a' over 'b' in my next text analysis (move 40), since it will require plenty of diagrams and a lot of explanations. I know there will be people who disagree with me. I can only hope the people who do aren't the stronger ones :D.
User avatar
daniel_the_smith
Gosei
Posts: 2116
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
Rank: 2d AGA
GD Posts: 1193
KGS: lavalamp
Tygem: imapenguin
IGS: lavalamp
OGS: daniel_the_smith
Location: Silicon Valley
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 330 times
Contact:

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by daniel_the_smith »

Second line, the line of champions! (re Joaz's move)

I would have played Araban's b...
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
unkx80
Lives with ko
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:21 am
Rank: Dan player
GD Posts: 0
Location: Singapore
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 30 times
Contact:

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by unkx80 »

a is better in my opinion - solid and leaves less aji. The top is small and unimportant.

I'm not trying to be condescending, but what kind of move is this black descent? It just feels plain wrong to me.
User avatar
Aphelion
Lives in sente
Posts: 766
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:14 pm
Rank: KGS 4 kyu
GD Posts: 227
KGS: Aphelion02
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Aphelion »

I too would have played 'b' without any thought at all. 'a' seems better after reading all these comments but for me 'b' just seems like a good momentum play .
User avatar
Shaddy
Lives in sente
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:44 pm
Rank: KGS 5d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 192 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Shaddy »

I'd probably take a here. Solid is good.
User avatar
Chew Terr
Gosei
Posts: 2060
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:45 pm
Rank: KGS 3k
GD Posts: 264
KGS: Chew
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 546 times
Been thanked: 172 times
Contact:

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Chew Terr »

My choice would have been 'a', which means that, according to the 'Second Terrian Theory of Correctness', the right answer is probably 'b'.
Someday I want to be strong enough to earn KGS[-].
User avatar
fwiffo
Gosei
Posts: 1435
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
Rank: Out of practice
GD Posts: 1104
KGS: fwiffo
Location: California
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 168 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by fwiffo »

The reasoning behind :w24: makes a seem quite natural to me. :b25: seems like something I would play and then feel bad about (sorry Joaz).
User avatar
SoDesuNe
Gosei
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:57 am
Rank: KGS 1-dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 490 times
Been thanked: 365 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by SoDesuNe »

I would have played 'a' even before I saw how Araban himself responds ^^
User avatar
gaius
Lives in gote
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:55 am
Rank: Dutch 2 dan
GD Posts: 56
KGS: hopjesvla
Has thanked: 193 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by gaius »

AAHH, why does Joaz try to save useless stones *right after* his opponent spends a move to more or less neutralise them?? Instead of the game move ('a') I would play this black 1 every time. Just the difference between this whole board (albeit a bit loose) black moyo and a white move there seems huge!
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc Move 23
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O X . . . . . X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . O O . X . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . X W a . . . X , O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . X O . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . X , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

By the way, if I were white, I would not have played the marked move. Instead, I would have extended at 1; white is pretty solid on the top side anyway. But then again, I know nothing, I'm only 1 kyu...
My name is Gijs, from Utrecht, NL.

When in doubt, play the most aggressive move
Oroth
Dies in gote
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 1:40 am
GD Posts: 20
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: 42. Joaz Banbeck (1d) vs. Araban (5d)

Post by Oroth »

Araban,

I really like your videos, it seems like they let you cover quite a lot of content in a short time. I especially hope you use them if you are going to include a few variations - I really do prefer video in that case as I tend to find following numbered diagrams with more than a couple of numbers a bit of work. The same for Joaz - I really appreciate the amount of work you put in to explain your thinking, but when illustrating your reading video is my preferred format.

Not for players:

@daniel_the_smith

Regarding the differences in Joaz's and Sol's understanding of the position I have been struck in general in Malkovich games between the difference in thinking between player's appreciation of the position - the Violence / Magicwand in particular are noteworthy as they seem to be of a similiar strength and the difference comes down to attitude. In this game I tend to feel the difference comes from Sol being a bit stronger and thinking more clearly about the game. I think this is shown by the feeling of observers that Joaz's position is already becoming unfavourable.
Post Reply