Re: Next EGF Professionals
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 1:35 pm
Life in 19x19. Go, Weiqi, Baduk... Thats the life.
https://www.lifein19x19.com/
Actually, if you consider tournament bridge in the mid-20th century (before about 1960, I guess), you do see players dressing rather formally. And there was a genteel atmosphere. But that ship has sailed. And I don't see much value in trying to bring it back for go.Pippen wrote:I think the professional Go must behave professional, i.e. trying to go for the money. One way is to build up an image, a brand...and one important aspect is clothing. No top venture would sponsor guys that look like trivial students. Go tournaments and go players must be treated very closely to what composers and musicians in a classic orchestra are treated like. There must be a smell of elitarity around them and that starts with a dress and behaviour code. The next step has to be to choose only elitarian hotels for the top tournaments, even if that means less tournaments, continued by an constant push for publicity by trying to offer articles to big newspapers and to cover main matches through the Internet constantly. And then of course EGF has to use the advantage of the chaotic asian market and establish a simple world champ system very closely to what chess did till 1995.
I know that sounds bold and compromises a lot of inherent go values - it would destroy the loveliness of the small go community in the western world - but if you think professionally, if you want someone to "show you the money" you gotta act accordingly.
I basically agree. But of course the consequence will be that those EGF pro's will never make much money in Europe and America, and to make it in Asia they are too weak. Then after a couple of years when those young men are over 30 they might quit Go because they will have friends that are average in their profession and still double their income. That'd be a waste. Those pro's have to stay with Go like Catalin Taranu or Alex Dinerchtein to promote Go more efficently and later work in Go institutions.Bill Spight wrote:And there was a genteel atmosphere. But that ship has sailed. And I don't see much value in trying to bring it back for go.
Tournaments need sponsors and teaching pros need students. Go pros are a new thing in the West. I think that it is too early to predict gloom and doom.Pippen wrote:I basically agree. But of course the consequence will be that those EGF pro's will never make much money in Europe and America, and to make it in Asia they are too weak. Then after a couple of years when those young men are over 30 they might quit Go because they will have friends that are average in their profession and still double their income. That'd be a waste. Those pro's have to stay with Go like Catalin Taranu or Alex Dinerchtein to promote Go more efficently and later work in Go institutions.Bill Spight wrote:And there was a genteel atmosphere. But that ship has sailed. And I don't see much value in trying to bring it back for go.
Is it okay to predict gloom or doom?Bill Spight wrote: Tournaments need sponsors and teaching pros need students. Go pros are a new thing in the West. I think that it is too early to predict gloom and doom.
If I may repeat something I have said before: when reading about the history of the professional organisations in the various oriental countries I have always been struck by the immense amount of work done by the pros themselves to create their own environment. They did not sit around waiting for sponsors or students. They went out and nurtured them, working so hard in a couple of cases that it led to nervous breakdowns and early deaths. Some pros even gave up for a while - Iwamoto becoming a coffee-farm worker in Brazil springs to mind, but quite a few joined the civil service or journalism, or whatever, so that go was effectively just their hobby. The Chinese players even had to put up with the Cultural Revolution, so the likes of Nie Weiping ended up being re-educated on farms with only a go board in their heads. The Koreans relied essentially on one man: Cho Nam-ch'eol.Tournaments need sponsors and teaching pros need students. Go pros are a new thing in the West. I think that it is too early to predict gloom and doom.
I don't recall ever seeing a Japanese pro with his elbow on the table before.HermanHiddema wrote:Oh, and for those who care more about the clothes, here's the previous two pros (Lisy and Jabarin) at a match in Japan:
Found one for you in 30 seconds of googling:DrStraw wrote:I don't recall ever seeing a Japanese pro with his elbow on the table before.HermanHiddema wrote:Oh, and for those who care more about the clothes, here's the previous two pros (Lisy and Jabarin) at a match in Japan:
But that is clearly in the review stage. I was thinking about during play.Uberdude wrote:Found one for you in 30 seconds of googling:DrStraw wrote:I don't recall ever seeing a Japanese pro with his elbow on the table before.HermanHiddema wrote:Oh, and for those who care more about the clothes, here's the previous two pros (Lisy and Jabarin) at a match in Japan:
http://www.seattlego.org/wp-content/upl ... t-move.jpg
3 points.I don't recall ever seeing a Japanese pro with his elbow on the table before.

John Fairbairn wrote:What struck me instantly about this photo is how few of the players are looking at the board. In my experience that's not pro or insei behaviour.
Interestingly, as can be seen in honte's second set of photos, the semi-finalists (Shikshin, Surma, Pop and Kachanovskyi) are focussed on the board immediately (at 2-5 moves into the game).John Fairbairn wrote:...focusing your attention on the board at all times...
As far as I've heard, starting from next year, only one shin-shodan shall emerge every year.Uberdude wrote:How often will they make new pros, and 2 each time? Wasn't it just over half a year ago we got the first two? I worry making 2 per year (or more frequently) will mean we end up demeaning the title of professional too much with too weak players becoming ones (should be EGF 7ds not 6d IMO).
But well done Mateusz! He's a nice guy.