I didn't put in a ton of time on this, but at move 1 it already seems basically correct
This is Japanese KataGo rules with 6 komi using a 60b network
To have actual good analysis I would need about this many playouts on each variation, so I'm still ways out from making any actual claims other than it looks like there are four moves that are equally good in the opening (I verified by testing the 3-3 and 3-4 variations manually)
Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
-
iopq
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:19 am
- Rank: 1d
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: iopq
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot from 2021-10-15 23-26-31.png (171.28 KiB) Viewed 5792 times
-
iopq
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:19 am
- Rank: 1d
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: iopq
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
I've already verified that 3-3 and 3-4 are not optimal by searching from those positions manually
So the top four moves are:
5-5 tengen
4-4 hoshi
5-4 takamoku
5-3 mokuhazushi
So the top four moves are:
5-5 tengen
4-4 hoshi
5-4 takamoku
5-3 mokuhazushi
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-40-08.png (166.24 KiB) Viewed 5475 times
-
- Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-39-54.png (167.85 KiB) Viewed 5475 times
-
- Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-32-37.png (164.7 KiB) Viewed 5475 times
-
iopq
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:19 am
- Rank: 1d
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: iopq
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Preliminary analysis of 9x9 openings with KataGo
I'll get a bit more time on it to post the full HTML files, but you get the idea
Most lines close to 50% are most likely to be optimal, lines outside +/- 5% are more likely to be suboptimal
Most lines close to 50% are most likely to be optimal, lines outside +/- 5% are more likely to be suboptimal
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot from 2021-10-31 17-40-08.png (166.24 KiB) Viewed 5475 times