Chess: Missouri federal court on Niemann

All non-Go discussions should go here.
Post Reply
RobertJasiek
Judan
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
GD Posts: 0
Been thanked: 797 times
Contact:

Chess: Missouri federal court on Niemann

Post by RobertJasiek »

Missouri's federal court dismisses Niemann's $100 million claim as to anti-trust actions by Carlsen et al permanently and other aspects due to wrong jurisdiction. He can, however, pursue aspects of alleged defamation related to alleged cheating etc. at a state court.
Elom0
Lives in sente
Posts: 732
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2022 9:03 pm
Rank: BGA 3 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Elom, Windnwater
OGS: Elom, Elom0
Online playing schedule: The OGS data looks pretty so I'll pause for now before I change it.
Has thanked: 1028 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Missouri federal court on Niemann

Post by Elom0 »

RobertJasiek wrote:Missouri's federal court dismisses Niemann's $100 million claim as to anti-trust actions by Carlsen et al permanently and other aspects due to wrong jurisdiction. He can, however, pursue aspects of alleged defamation related to alleged cheating etc. at a state court.
Why didn't he use a state court from the start instead of wasting his own time on this expectable result.
kvasir
Lives in sente
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 12:29 am
Rank: panda 5 dan
GD Posts: 0
IGS: kvasir
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 187 times

Re: Missouri federal court on Niemann

Post by kvasir »

Now there is this https://www.chess.com/blog/CHESScom/che ... -chess-com

tldr would be the slightly misleading and out-of-context quote from Magnus Carlsen: "...willing to play Niemann..."
User avatar
Joaz Banbeck
Judan
Posts: 5546
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
Rank: 1D AGA
GD Posts: 1512
Kaya handle: Test
Location: Banbeck Vale
Has thanked: 1080 times
Been thanked: 1434 times

Re: Missouri federal court on Niemann

Post by Joaz Banbeck »

Elom0 wrote:...
Why didn't he use a state court from the start instead of wasting his own time on this expectable result.
Probably a gamble, as many civil legal actions are.

The plantiffs - for some reason unknown to me - consider the federal venue to be a more favorable one. The filing costs are relatively small compared to the claim. The filing attorney is probably doing it for a share of the potential profits. So it may be a good bet.

If they lose the jurisdictional issue, they are out the filing fee. If they win, they have a chance of winning the main action. So the net expectation is big.

BTW, if you have any insights as to why this is an 'expectable result', I'd like to read them.
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
Javaness2
Gosei
Posts: 1545
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:48 am
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 322 times
Contact:

Re: Chess: Missouri federal court on Niemann

Post by Javaness2 »

What a sorry affair from start to finish. Given the mention of anal beads, it is unlikely to gain entry to Edward Winter's ChessHistory site.

The MeToo letter and Transgender policies have also been attracting some attention...
Post Reply