Invading the high side.

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Post Reply
Alguien
Lives in gote
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:50 pm
Rank: KGS 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Alguien
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Invading the high side.

Post by Alguien »

How would you invade the side in a situation like this?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X c . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . e . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
User avatar
SoDesuNe
Gosei
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:57 am
Rank: KGS 1-dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 490 times
Been thanked: 365 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by SoDesuNe »

A) Don't let this happen in the first place.
B) a - and hoping to make good sabaki.
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Uberdude »

White should have played moves instead of passing.
User avatar
Bonobo
Oza
Posts: 2226
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 6:39 pm
Rank: OGS 13k
GD Posts: 0
OGS: trohde
Universal go server handle: trohde
Location: Lüneburg Heath, North Germany
Has thanked: 8263 times
Been thanked: 925 times
Contact:

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Bonobo »

Perhaps this was free handicap positioning?
“The only difference between me and a madman is that I’m not mad.” — Salvador Dali
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Bill Spight »

Alguien wrote:How would you invade the side in a situation like this?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X c . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . e . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Earlier. ;)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Phoenix
Lives with ko
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:44 pm
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Phoenix »

By resigning.
User avatar
ez4u
Oza
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
Rank: Jp 6 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: ez4u
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Has thanked: 2351 times
Been thanked: 1332 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by ez4u »

Alguien wrote:How would you invade the side in a situation like this?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . X . . . . . X c . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . e . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
You mean here? I'd have to think about it but "a" is looking big to me. :blackeye: But seriously, the original question has no meaning without knowing the rest of the board. If the partial position is from a high handicap game, Black is going to be outfought to some degree anyway so where to start has to take that into consideration. If it is an even game then White has a lot of stones elsewhere and we need to be able to figure out how much White needs to reduce the right side in order to maintain balance in the game.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . O . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . a . . X . . . . . X c . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f . . |
$$ | . . . O . . O . . O . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . e . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
Alguien
Lives in gote
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:50 pm
Rank: KGS 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Alguien
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Alguien »

Thank you. I'll interpret the replies as: "Your problem isn't not knowing how to invade that position, it's not knowing that it shouldn't be possible."

Which tells me I should add a caveat to my concepts:
- "fourth line is for influence."
- "three space jumps aren't secure."

to: "...unless you've got outside influence that makes a cut and escape unable to connect to safety."

Is that closer to being right?


I think my main problem is interpreting all those times a dan player says "there are weaknesses at a, b, c, d, ..." as "I could invade there". Instead I might have to interpret those as "there is aji at those positions that I might be able to use in some way, with adequate support."
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Bill Spight »

Alguien wrote:Thank you. I'll interpret the replies as: "Your problem isn't not knowing how to invade that position, it's not knowing that it shouldn't be possible."

Which tells me I should add a caveat to my concepts:
- "fourth line is for influence."
- "three space jumps aren't secure."

to: "...unless you've got outside influence that makes a cut and escape unable to connect to safety."

Is that closer to being right?
Speaking for myself, the problem is not that an invasion is impossible, nor is it that White cannot live inside -- you do not always invade to live, but sometimes to sacrifice --, it is evaluating the tradeoffs of different plays. For White to invade and live on the right side is not difficult, but I would be reluctant to do so at the cost of strengthening Black's center. OTOH, does an initial play in the center make it too easy for Black on the side? There is a lot to be said for making things easy for yourself and preventing Black from making this formation in the first place. :)

I think my main problem is interpreting all those times a dan player says "there are weaknesses at a, b, c, d, ..." as "I could invade there". Instead I might have to interpret those as "there is aji at those positions that I might be able to use in some way, with adequate support."
Right. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Alguien wrote:Which tells me I should add a caveat to my concepts:
- "fourth line is X..."
- "three space jumps are Y..."
to: "...unless Z"

Is that closer to being right?
I found, after some point, it's better (for me anyway) to just unlearn these all together, and look at the board.
So (again, for me anyway) no, that is not closer to being right; I think it's getting more and more off course.
Alguien
Lives in gote
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:50 pm
Rank: KGS 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Alguien
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re:

Post by Alguien »

EdLee wrote:So (again, for me anyway) no, that is not closer to being right; I think it's getting more and more off course.
Eventually, I need general concepts to build my interpretation of the board. I can't just read everything.

I need to know that, unless massive nearby influence, I can live inside a 4-4 stone. That a two space jump on the side is safe for a while but has to be taken care of as the surroundings get occupied. That I'll get a better result moving my stones in a way that creates two dimensional areas instead of one dimensional lines.

I need those concepts even is they aren't absolute truths, because otherwise I'd need hours for each move.

I understand it's important to remember that those "rules" are just guidelines, and that when the situation thickens I'll have to read to check whether they apply or not. However I don't agree with just discarding that way of understanding go altogether.

That's why, every time one of my concepts fails, I ask for help to check whether it failed because I misread or because the concept itself was wrong.

In this case (the real case of which this was an idealization) I really thought that those five stones in a fourth line could be comfortably lived under. Probably because of having allowed it while being black in high handicap games.

With the answers I've now reviewed my concept. Next time I find myself in the same situation I won't believe I can simply live under and thus I won't allow the situation to reach that point.

For reference, the real position is this:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Moves 94 to 103
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , O . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . O . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X X O . . O X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . O X O X O X . . . . . . 8 . . |
$$ | . O . . X X O . O X . . . . 7 . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . O O X . . . . 9 6 5 3 . . |
$$ | . X X , O . X O X , . . . . 0 X 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . O O X . . . . . . . 4 2 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O X O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X X . . . X X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X O O O . X O . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . X X X O O X O . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X X O . O X O X X O X . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . X O O . O O . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
This is what I want to learn to never repeat. :)
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Uberdude »

Alguien wrote: For reference, the real position is this:
Well that's totally different! For starters white has some points on the rest of the board. My first answer was not just facetious, invasion decisions are not local, they are global. Most importantly they depend on the count: do I even need to invade? They depend on the strength of your nearby positions, possibilities for connecting to them and what damage can be done to them from thickness your opponent builds when you invade: in that position the nearby white groups are much stronger than the question diagram.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Bill Spight »

A couple of brief comments. :)

The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
cyclops
Lives in sente
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:38 pm
Rank: KGS 7 kyu forever
GD Posts: 460
Location: Amsterdam (NL)
Has thanked: 353 times
Been thanked: 107 times
Contact:

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by cyclops »

I am hardly qualified, that is why I jump in.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . O . O . . . . . . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , O . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . O X . O . . . O . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X X O . . O X . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . O X O X O X . . . . . . 6 . . |
$$ | . O . . X X O . O X . . . . b . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . . O O X . . . . 7 a 5 3 . . |
$$ | . X X , O . X O X , . . . . . X 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . O O X . . . . . . . 4 2 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . O X O . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X X . c . X X . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X O O O . X O d . . . . . . |
$$ | . X O O . X X X O O X O . . . X . . . |
$$ | . X X O . O X O X X O X . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . X O O . O O . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
In this position B would play b rather than a. That is why your 6 ( at a ) is wrong (IMHO). After b black drives w to his stones in the center where he has the forcing move at d and the wedge at c to exploit for a nice attack.
Alguien
Lives in gote
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:50 pm
Rank: KGS 3k
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Alguien
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Invading the high side.

Post by Alguien »

cyclops wrote:
In this position B would play b rather than a. That is why your 6 ( at a ) is wrong (IMHO). After b black drives w to his stones in the center where he has the forcing move at d and the wedge at c to exploit for a nice attack.
I was w in that game and b played that.
Post Reply