breakfast wrote:With only few Asians, Robert Jasiek will put lot of 4-5d Europeans to the supergroup. Someone from EGC team or EGF has to stop him and make the supergroup smaller than 32.
1) It does not depend on the number of non-Europeans per se but on how many of them up to ca. 8 are strong enough to be in the supergroup.
2) It is not exclusively me to form the supergroup but the tournament supervisors form them and the most likely there will be at least two of them.
3) Although you demand breaking the (spirit of the) rules, I will apply the rules.
4) It is unlikely that "a lot of", if any, 4d will be in the supergroup. Rather it looks like enough 5d+ will be there.
5) The EGC team does not have the power to stop the tournament supervisors. The latter have the greater power WRT to rules enforcement.
6) The EGF Committee is above the tournament supervisors. If the EGF Committee wants to change the rules ad hoc, then presumably it might do so (like declaring a smaller or larger supergroup size). The EGF Committee is responsible to the AGM, so if the AGM should not like particular ad hoc rules changes, it might affect reelection:)
7) The AGM cannot affect the supergroup setting of 2010 because it meets later.
8) Instead of your propaganda against me, you should address the appropriate body, the AGM via delegates by motions so that the rules might be changed regularly. Quite like I addressed the AGM to get a change from 24 to ca. 24 and from 4d to at least ca. 4d. I have achieved the only noteworthy change on the supergroup so far. What have you achieved so far? Nothing. Work out reasonable proposals and provide careful reasoning instead of trying to bypass rules and ordinary ways of rules changes while trying to blame me for having a different opinion.
Let's have the discussion here instead of the announcements-forum. Any discussion about EGC or questions for the organizers are welcome.
