SmoothOper wrote:Sure I may be wrong on the specifics, but anyhow if you look at it java programmers don't look very good.
I'm sorry that you are inconvenienced by trying to run all that free software that people spend lots time to write.
SmoothOper wrote:Sure I may be wrong on the specifics, but anyhow if you look at it java programmers don't look very good.
speedchase wrote:SmoothOper wrote:Sure I may be wrong on the specifics, but anyhow if you look at it java programmers don't look very good.
I'm sorry that you are inconvenienced by trying to run all that free software that people spend lots time to write.
SmoothOper wrote:Well, I am not sorry, that you can't make any money on your free apps.
SmoothOper wrote:because Java programmers are poor programmers.
speedchase wrote:SmoothOper wrote:Well, I am not sorry, that you can't make any money on your free apps.
In general free apps don't make any money, regardless of how many people use themSmoothOper wrote:because Java programmers are poor programmers.
This is a pretty big generalization, I still don't understand why you think this, or what you want to discuss
SmoothOper wrote:I am just defending my assertion that the technology that was chosen for KGS could be part of the reason it isn't making any money
SmoothOper wrote:As you can see the Java community functions as a loosely knit semi-informed political organization that has an interest in purporting several untruths about what Java is and what its performance and requirements are, so these conversations can drag on.
speedchase wrote:purporting untruths about java is you.
SmoothOper wrote:I wouldn't trust anything a Java programmer says