Bill has mentioned a couple of times recently that the short keima, as opposed to the long ogeima, is a relatively recent response to an approach against a star stone.
Indeed, GoGoD's first example is from 1934. Since it was a serious game - the Oteai - I thought I would look up the commentary.
As was the practice then, both players provided post-mortem thoughts. Black was Fukuda Masayoshi. The relevant move was 9, and I've inserted his comment in the sgf file. Nothing earth-shattering. Not even any sense of trying something new. On the other hand, it was clear a fuseki-inspired response and not a joseki-inspired response - a pro's a pro!
The continuation was unusual - again nothing joseki-like. This keima wasn't tried again for a couple of years, Perhaps strangely, it wasn't discussed in Shin Fuseki-ho. But the first example of the now famous joseki where A answers B' keima with a keima slide into the corner, B defends at the 3-3 point and A extends two spaces along the side was due to Kitani in a game against Go Seigen, in 1942, but it wasn't really taken up until the 1950s, and even then only patchily.
(;FF[3]SZ[19]EV[Oteai]PB[Fukuda Masayoshi]BR[5d]PW[Maeda Nobuaki]WR[5d]KM[0]RE[W+4]US[GoGoD95]
;B[qd];W[ec];B[nc];W[qo];B[pq];W[qk];B[dp];W[cn];B[fq]LB[gq:A][op:B][mq:C][jq:D]
C[If I try Black 9 wider at A, White has the press at B, and if I play the one-space jump at C, White has C, Black B, White D.]
;W[cd];B[ci];W[bp];B[cm];W[bm];B[bn];W[bo];B[dn];W[co];B[bl];W[do];B[am];W[gp];B[hq]
;W[dm];B[en];W[cl];B[bm];W[eo];B[fn];W[eq];B[hp];W[go];B[er];W[dr];B[dq];W[ep];B[cr]
;W[fr];B[ds];W[gq];B[bq];W[el];B[gm];W[ck];B[bk];W[ho];B[ei];W[fj];B[il];W[fi];B[fl]
;W[ej];B[eh];W[ji];B[kl];W[ko];B[fd];W[fc];B[gd];W[fh];B[ef];W[ff];B[ed];W[dd];B[de]
;W[ce];B[em];W[dl];B[dj];W[ek];B[gc];W[cj];B[bj];W[bh];B[bi];W[je];B[po];W[pn];B[qn]
)