That keima

Higher level discussions, analysis of professional games, etc., go here.
Post Reply
John Fairbairn
Oza
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:09 am
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 4672 times

That keima

Post by John Fairbairn »

Bill has mentioned a couple of times recently that the short keima, as opposed to the long ogeima, is a relatively recent response to an approach against a star stone.

Indeed, GoGoD's first example is from 1934. Since it was a serious game - the Oteai - I thought I would look up the commentary.

As was the practice then, both players provided post-mortem thoughts. Black was Fukuda Masayoshi. The relevant move was 9, and I've inserted his comment in the sgf file. Nothing earth-shattering. Not even any sense of trying something new. On the other hand, it was clear a fuseki-inspired response and not a joseki-inspired response - a pro's a pro!

The continuation was unusual - again nothing joseki-like. This keima wasn't tried again for a couple of years, Perhaps strangely, it wasn't discussed in Shin Fuseki-ho. But the first example of the now famous joseki where A answers B' keima with a keima slide into the corner, B defends at the 3-3 point and A extends two spaces along the side was due to Kitani in a game against Go Seigen, in 1942, but it wasn't really taken up until the 1950s, and even then only patchily.

Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: That keima

Post by Bill Spight »

Thanks, John. :)

Interesting play in the bottom left corner. Especially to those who think that :b13: is a new idea. ;)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply