It is currently Tue May 20, 2025 3:40 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: a 0.5 loss against a 3k player, review request please
Post #1 Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 12:34 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 155
Liked others: 160
Was liked: 4
Rank: 4k OGS 1d Fox
Online playing schedule: OGS, Fox Server
Hi all,

I played a close game against a 3k player and I need some review especially playing out ko threats and ladder breaker.
Thanks in advance, I am black


_________________
Don't play 1-2-3
Just play 3

(Go proverb)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #2 Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 8:15 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Hi Fllecha,
Just an idea for :b4: --
If this happens, UL and LL are exactly symmetrical,
and it's B's turn. So you know you have kept your lead.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ -----------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #3 Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 8:20 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
:b8: What was your plan if :w9: attaches at D8 ?
Would you have played the same continuation as in the real game ?

If we look at the board at :w7:,
do you see your :b8: jumps into one of the narrowest areas on the whole board ? Why ?

Did you consider D14 instead ?

:b10: - :b12: If you plan was to make this exchange,
then why give W the extra stone :b8: ?

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #4 Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 8:33 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
:b18:
In this joseki, :b2: is a keima.
( See also :b29: .. :w32: )
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Joseki
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . 2 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . 5 . . 1 . . 4 . . |
$$ . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]

But in the game, :w17: = :wc: slides first.
If you take 3-3, then if W still jumps out,
then because of the exchange ( :wc: - :b1: ), now you can jump farther, to :b3: --
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . 2 . . . . . |
$$ , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . B . O . . 1 . . |
$$ . . . . . . W . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]
Compared to the joseki above:
- :b3: has jumped farther;
- instead of making a base, :w2: is just running;
- :bc: has pincered W.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #5 Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 8:44 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
:b18: - :b20:
The sequence in the game is strange.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Joseki
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . 2 . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . 4 . 1 . . 5 . . |
$$ . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W Joseki (cont'd)
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ , . . 9 8 . X . . . |
$$ . . X 0 O 6 . O . . |
$$ . . . . . 7 O . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm11 Joseki (cont'd)
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . . a b . . . . . |
$$ , . . O X . X . . . |
$$ . . X X O X . O . . |
$$ . . . . 1 O O . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]
Next, B has the choices of (a), (b), and others, depending on the whole board.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #6 Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 8:52 pm 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
:b22: Tenuki is strange.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ , . . O X . X . . . |
$$ . . X 1 O X . O . . |
$$ . . . . 2 O O . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]

:w23: W doesn't have to reply to your :b22: :
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . 1 . . . . . |
$$ , . . O X 2 X . . . |
$$ . . X 3 O X . O . . |
$$ . . . . . O O . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ --------------------[/go]

:w25: Very strange.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: a 0.5 loss against a 3k player, review request please
Post #7 Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 11:21 pm 
Lives with ko

Posts: 211
Liked others: 16
Was liked: 62
Rank: KGS 1k EGF 2k
KGS: Schachus12
:b28: is almost comletely wasted. That 1 stone is probably the least important stone on the board in that moment, it doesnt do anything since you captured 03.Instead you could block at r5, which is big.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #8 Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:20 am 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Hi Fllecha,

To add to Schachus, about :b28: --
If you have experience in a car going fast, the windshield sometimes collects all kinds of insects:
Attachment:
image.jpg
image.jpg [ 74.31 KiB | Viewed 9871 times ]
The :w19: stone is like one of them.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #9 Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:32 am 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
:w33: .. :b38: Maybe you didn't have a plan on how to deal with :w33: .
You just let W jump into your bottom and you didn't do anything about it.

The board at :b38: -- a few of the problems:
  • ( :b2: , :b14: , :b38: ) this shape is not a good combination for Black;
  • :b22: is misplaced;
  • ( :w29: , :w31: ) didn't finish the joseki, but you didn't punish W until :b40: ;
  • After ( :b34: , :b36: ), you still have a weakness at E3;

:w45: Bad.

:b50: , :b52: End game moves; too early, too small.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #10 Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:51 am 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
Fllecha wrote:
especially ... ko threats and ladder breaker.
Hi Fllecha,

Sometimes our biggest problems (in Go) aren't what we think they are.
( Quite common for certain levels. )
You can see this from a (brief) survey of the game up to :b52: .

Samples of the big problems:
- Basic shapes;
- The value of stones ( important v. unimportant stones );
- Small, slow moves ( the value of moves );
- Sente v. gote.


This post by EdLee was liked by: dfan
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject:
Post #11 Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 1:10 am 
Honinbo
User avatar

Posts: 8859
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Liked others: 349
Was liked: 2076
GD Posts: 312
:b54: Small, slow. ( And pushing from behind )
Locally, you can jump to P10.
Globally, there are bigger moves (e.g. G16, P16, R6 ).

:b56: Big loss. Q18.

:b84: Wrong shape. If you want to reply locally, K14.


This post by EdLee was liked by: Fllecha
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: a 0.5 loss against a 3k player, review request please
Post #12 Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 1:19 am 
Oza
User avatar

Posts: 2432
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Liked others: 360
Was liked: 1021
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
A halfpointer will always elicit my endgame review :)

At 96 Black makes an unfavorable offer for an exchange and White accepts it. This puts him slightly ahead. If instead Black pulls out his stones, he has a comfortable lead.

At 99 the endgame starts, if you wish. Black does well but misses an opportunity to forestall the ko at the bottom.

At 147 White makes a bizarre mistake that cost him 4 points
At 152 however, Black makes a similar mistake costing him 2-3 points

A missed opportunity for White aside, after that the game is lost for Black, if only by half a point.



This post by Knotwilg was liked by 2 people: emeraldemon, Fllecha
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: a 0.5 loss against a 3k player, review request please
Post #13 Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 10:36 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 155
Liked others: 160
Was liked: 4
Rank: 4k OGS 1d Fox
Online playing schedule: OGS, Fox Server
ty guys, i need some time to study your reviews but i'll answer shortly ty

_________________
Don't play 1-2-3
Just play 3

(Go proverb)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re:
Post #14 Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 7:45 am 
Lives with ko

Posts: 155
Liked others: 160
Was liked: 4
Rank: 4k OGS 1d Fox
Online playing schedule: OGS, Fox Server
EdLee wrote:
:b8: What was your plan if :w9: attaches at D8 ?
Would you have played the same continuation as in the real game ?

If we look at the board at :w7:,
do you see your :b8: jumps into one of the narrowest areas on the whole board ? Why ?

Did you consider D14 instead ?

:b10: - :b12: If you plan was to make this exchange,
then why give W the extra stone :b8: ?


This is a bad habit that I had when I started the game. The idea is to defend the corner in (almost) sente, even if white attaches, to avoid the annoyong 3-3 invasion. According to Eidogo joseki tutor the stone sacrifice is a Lee Changho idea.

The problem is that even if black succedes to defend the corner in sente the position that arises is somewhat weak anyway and against strong opponents, so I started avoiding that move. ;)

About the 22 stone the idea was to play a nice ladder breaker which succeded, but looking at the variation you made it was completely unnecessary if black would have answered by connecting in the LR.

Very much appreciated endgame analysis knotwling! many thanks ;)
Ty guys ;)

_________________
Don't play 1-2-3
Just play 3

(Go proverb)

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Re:
Post #15 Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 6:02 am 
Lives in gote

Posts: 450
Liked others: 5
Was liked: 189
Rank: BGA 3 dan
Fllecha wrote:
EdLee wrote:

:b10: - :b12: If you plan was to make this exchange,
then why give W the extra stone :b8: ?


This is a bad habit that I had when I started the game. The idea is to defend the corner in (almost) sente, even if white attaches, to avoid the annoyong 3-3 invasion. According to Eidogo joseki tutor the stone sacrifice is a Lee Changho idea.


I'm suitably impressed. But this type of "pattern" is more often disadvantageous than helpful.

By "pattern" I mean sequence, order of play, not "shape".

Your :b34: and :b36: is not what I'd play: I'd want :b34: one to the left, to avoid a weakness, and adding to the strong side with :b36: goes against good feeling.

Also :b38: and :b40:. I think you should just play at :b40:. A fight can come out of the right side, and I can't tell whether the :b38: for :w39: exchange will be correct, from the point of view of that fight. Usually having stones in the centre helps with fighting, so you have perhaps just helped White.


This post by Charles Matthews was liked by: Fllecha
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: a 0.5 loss against a 3k player, review request please
Post #16 Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 7:10 am 
Judan

Posts: 6727
Location: Cambridge, UK
Liked others: 436
Was liked: 3720
Rank: UK 4 dan
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Charles Matthews wrote:
Fllecha wrote:
EdLee wrote:

:b10: - :b12: If you plan was to make this exchange,
then why give W the extra stone :b8: ?


This is a bad habit that I had when I started the game. The idea is to defend the corner in (almost) sente, even if white attaches, to avoid the annoyong 3-3 invasion. According to Eidogo joseki tutor the stone sacrifice is a Lee Changho idea.


I'm suitably impressed. But this type of "pattern" is more often disadvantageous than helpful.

By "pattern" I mean sequence, order of play, not "shape".


Fllecha, a study suggestion: can you find this strategy/pattern lurking beneath the surface in AlphaGo vs Lee Sedol game 2?

Clue:
It would have been a nice idea for AlphaGo, so Lee varied to avoid it, but AlphaGo came up with a nice counter to that too.


This post by Uberdude was liked by: Fllecha
Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: a 0.5 loss against a 3k player, review request please
Post #17 Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 10:03 pm 
Honinbo

Posts: 10905
Liked others: 3651
Was liked: 3374
White missed chances to invade the bottom left corner. I am evaluating some positions based upon it here: viewtopic.php?f=12&t=12327&p=204833#p204833 :)

_________________
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group