My opponent played
4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
- fwiffo
- Gosei
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
- Rank: Out of practice
- GD Posts: 1104
- KGS: fwiffo
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 168 times
4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
I just had this joseki come up in a game (I'm white):
My opponent played
, which is not joseki as far as I'm aware (should be directly at
). It doesn't seem like black should get the hane-connect for free if it's not joseki... But I'm having trouble coming up with a response for white that isn't worse than joseki. As the game went, I played it badly and I'm going to die. It doesn't seem like this position should really be that confounding!
My opponent played
-
Kirby
- Honinbo
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Kirby
- Tygem: 커비라고해
- Has thanked: 1583 times
- Been thanked: 1707 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Seems slightly more gote-ish for black the way he played. White might still answer, but I feel slightly more inclined to tenuki this way.
be immersed
- fwiffo
- Gosei
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
- Rank: Out of practice
- GD Posts: 1104
- KGS: fwiffo
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 168 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
I think white needs to protect against the hane in the corner or risk losing a lot.
- daniel_the_smith
- Gosei
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
- Rank: 2d AGA
- GD Posts: 1193
- KGS: lavalamp
- Tygem: imapenguin
- IGS: lavalamp
- OGS: daniel_the_smith
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
- Contact:
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Indeed, pros never play
. I can't see why not though. 
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
- judicata
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
- Rank: KGS 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: judicata
- Location: New York, NY
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Do you mean white needs to protect after black connects? The corner is small already, so there isn't much to reduce. I think if black can't kill, white should probably tenuki.fwiffo wrote:I think white needs to protect against the hane in the corner or risk losing a lot.
- daniel_the_smith
- Gosei
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
- Rank: 2d AGA
- GD Posts: 1193
- KGS: lavalamp
- Tygem: imapenguin
- IGS: lavalamp
- OGS: daniel_the_smith
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
- Contact:
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
oh wait, I see now...
edit: wait, maybe I spoke too soon... :/
edit: wait, maybe I spoke too soon... :/
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
- fwiffo
- Gosei
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
- Rank: Out of practice
- GD Posts: 1104
- KGS: fwiffo
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 168 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
If white doesn't play another move after the hane-connect, white can be pushed around badly just to survive. So yeah, black can't kill, but white will be forced to crawl on the second line to live or be shut in badly.
- topazg
- Tengen
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
- Rank: Nebulous
- GD Posts: 918
- KGS: topazg
- Location: Chatteris, UK
- Has thanked: 1579 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
- Contact:
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
My gut feeling is that White only has 8 points anyway. Sente at corner joseki stage is surely worth more than the reduction possibilities Black has, provided White is unconditionally alive? Which I suppose means the descent is a definite kill threat.fwiffo wrote:If white doesn't play another move after the hane-connect, white can be pushed around badly just to survive. So yeah, black can't kill, but white will be forced to crawl on the second line to live or be shut in badly.
- judicata
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
- Rank: KGS 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: judicata
- Location: New York, NY
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
According to a quick GoGoD search, the first 11 moves appear in only 15 games.daniel_the_smith wrote:Indeed, pros never play. I can't see why not though.
-
Kirby
- Honinbo
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Kirby
- Tygem: 커비라고해
- Has thanked: 1583 times
- Been thanked: 1707 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
IMO, the point is that white may still protect, but he is less inclined to protect than with the joseki sequence. Sente is based on the amount of points something is worth.fwiffo wrote:I think white needs to protect against the hane in the corner or risk losing a lot.
So let's say that joseki makes it worth X points for white to defend. I believe that it is worth less than X points for white to defend in this position - say Y points.
So if something is on the board valued between X and Y, that would make the difference between this and joseki.
In other words,
be immersed
- fwiffo
- Gosei
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
- Rank: Out of practice
- GD Posts: 1104
- KGS: fwiffo
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 168 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
I'm being a little bit unclear. I'm also being a little bit cagey because I'm analysing an alternate history of a game-in-progress and don't want to spoil it.
I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b. In the game, I cut at c and ended up in a bad way. My opponent has since blundered and let me off the hook - I even got to use a nose tesuji for the first time ever, but that's a whole nuther thread.
I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b. In the game, I cut at c and ended up in a bad way. My opponent has since blundered and let me off the hook - I even got to use a nose tesuji for the first time ever, but that's a whole nuther thread.
- judicata
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
- Rank: KGS 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: judicata
- Location: New York, NY
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
Are you saying black a or b kills? If not - white has maybe 7 points in the corner. If black reduces that to 2 points, black gets 5 points. If this is the opening, surely there is a move elsewhere worth more than 5 points?fwiffo wrote: I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b.
- topazg
- Tengen
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
- Rank: Nebulous
- GD Posts: 918
- KGS: topazg
- Location: Chatteris, UK
- Has thanked: 1579 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
- Contact:
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
I would be tempted to. I mean, playing locally is big, but:fwiffo wrote:I'm being a little bit unclear. I'm also being a little bit cagey because I'm analysing an alternate history of a game-in-progress and don't want to spoil it.
I don't think white can really tenuki in this position because of black moves at a or b. In the game, I cut at c and ended up in a bad way. My opponent has since blundered and let me off the hook - I even got to use a nose tesuji for the first time ever, but that's a whole nuther thread.
Because of the cut aji at "a", Black's going to want to play it or "b" at some point, giving White yet another free move. White can't be killed either:
Is simply alive, ignoring the remaining aji at "a". So, if we say that Black seals White in to only having about 2 or 3 points, and he had 8 points before, it's a loss of only 5-6 points + some ambiguous points for Black's thickness. In the late opening early middle game I understand a lot of moves are worth ~20 points or so (I remember this from a post-game discussion writeup where they played that "card go" game or whatever where the players could claim points and pass instead of move).
The argument being that actually the global temperature frequently goes up (increasing move value) after a few stones are down compared to an empty board.
So, for the loss of maybe 10 or so points I'd gladly take sente for something in the opening (bearing in mind that after
- fwiffo
- Gosei
- Posts: 1435
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:22 am
- Rank: Out of practice
- GD Posts: 1104
- KGS: fwiffo
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 168 times
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
My judgement was that the influence from sealing white in - not just white's points lost in territory - make it too big to tenuki. But that's based on my eye's judgment, so I may be overestimating that.
- topazg
- Tengen
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
- Rank: Nebulous
- GD Posts: 918
- KGS: topazg
- Location: Chatteris, UK
- Has thanked: 1579 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
- Contact:
Re: 4-4 pincer double-approach Joseki mistake?
That makes sense. I just consider White already completely sealed infwiffo wrote:My judgement was that the influence from sealing white in - not just white's points lost in territory - make it too big to tenuki. But that's based on my eye's judgment, so I may be overestimating that.