Small avalanche variation refutation

If you're new to the game and have questions, post them here.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: small avelanche variation refutation

Post by Bill Spight »

lovelove wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Joseki
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . 6 . . . , .
$$ | . . 3 X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 1 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]

That is no more joseki. White is thick.


If current opinion is that this is not joseki because White is too thick, then I suppose that :b1: is the deviation from joseki?
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by Uberdude »

SmoothOper wrote:One of the plays that I had learned if you don't want to play out the full avalanche, but still want an even result is, which seems similar to your problem, but black has given up a stone.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Small avalanche with early opt out by white.
$$-----------
$$|..........
$$|...8,.....
$$|..916.....
$$|..54......
$$|..32......
$$|...7......
$$|..........
$$|..........[/go]


This is bad for white, the simple dodge of :w8: is ok when black has played :b7: as nobi for the large avalanche as the 2 stones haven't lost a liberty, like this the hane is too painful for their liberties.
User avatar
emeraldemon
Gosei
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 1:33 pm
GD Posts: 0
KGS: greendemon
Tygem: greendemon
DGS: smaragdaemon
OGS: emeraldemon
Has thanked: 697 times
Been thanked: 287 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by emeraldemon »

The one I learned is the trade on the SL page:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Small avalanche
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 4 . . . .
$$ | . 3 1 X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]




Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm5 Canonical joseki
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X X . . . .
$$ | . O O X W 2 . . .
$$ | . . B O 4 1 8 . .
$$ | . . B O 5 6 . . .
$$ | . . 3 X 7 . . . .
$$ | . . . 9 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


http://senseis.xmp.net/?SmallAvalanche
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by Bill Spight »

emeraldemon wrote:The one I learned is the trade on the SL page:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm1 Small avalanche
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 4 . . . .
$$ | . 3 1 X O . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]




Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wcm5 Canonical joseki
$$ ------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X X . . . .
$$ | . O O X W 2 . . .
$$ | . . B O 4 1 8 . .
$$ | . . B O 5 6 . . .
$$ | . . 3 X 7 . . . .
$$ | . . . 9 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


http://senseis.xmp.net/?SmallAvalanche


Here is a good example of the ambiguity of language. Indeed, this is a small avalanche joseki. However, it is not, on an empty board, an equitable exchange, something that we expect from joseki. It is better for White.

The thing is, given the hane that makes the small avalanche, the rest is joseki. :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
lovelove
Lives in gote
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:21 am
Rank: Tygem 5 Dan
GD Posts: 0
Location: Séoul, Corée
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 365 times

Re: small avelanche variation refutation

Post by lovelove »

Bill Spight wrote:
lovelove wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Joseki
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . 6 . . . , .
$$ | . . 3 X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 1 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]

That is no more joseki. White is thick.

If current opinion is that this is not joseki because White is too thick, then I suppose that :b1: is the deviation from joseki?

Black has an option to fight, but the double hane joseki has become really rare.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Fight
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 9 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 3 8 5 . . . . .
$$ | . . X O 4 6 7 . . . .
$$ | . . X O 1 0 . . . , .
$$ | . . X X O 2 . . . . .
$$ | . . . O X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]

a or b in the next diagram is the modern choice in this avalanche joseki, which b is becoming more popular.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Modern Choice
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . b . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]
Amsterdam, soon.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: small avelanche variation refutation

Post by Bill Spight »

Bill Spight wrote:
lovelove wrote:
Bill Spight wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Joseki
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . 6 . . . , .
$$ | . . 3 X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 1 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]

That is no more joseki. White is thick.

If current opinion is that this is not joseki because White is too thick, then I suppose that :b1: is the deviation from joseki?

lovelove wrote:Black has an option to fight, but the double hane joseki has become really rare.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Fight
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 9 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 3 8 5 . . . . .
$$ | . . X O 4 6 7 . . . .
$$ | . . X O 1 0 . . . , .
$$ | . . X X O 2 . . . . .
$$ | . . . O X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]


This kind of fight is not new. Which still leaves me wondering why opinion has changed about the above diagram. It does not seem like any refutation has been found.

a or b in the next diagram is the modern choice in this avalanche joseki, which b is becoming more popular.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Modern Choice
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . b . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]


Yes, I think that "b" is a new idea when Black does not already have a stone at "a". :)
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
DeFlow
Lives with ko
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:54 pm
Rank: KGS 5 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: DefLow
Universal go server handle: DeFlow
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: small avelanche variation refutation

Post by DeFlow »

skydyr wrote:The shape looks similar to the fight that developed from the small-avalanche double hane in my malkovich game against Deflow. It's not exactly the same, but might be worth looking at because it features the same general idea of a crosscut fight stemming from it.


Jep, it might me worth looking at. =]

My reason for playing it was related to your judgement of the position, Otenki. In retrospect however, the cut does not seem to create two weak groups for white.

P.s. I'm back! At least, I am relatively back. ;)
User avatar
Tommie
Dies with sente
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:56 am
Rank: 3d EGF
GD Posts: 1700
Location: still above sea level: http://bit.ly/eQYULx
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by Tommie »

Isn't this so easy to compare?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 Fight? - no simply bad style?
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 9 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 3 8 5 . . . . .
$$ | . . X O 4 6 7 . . . .
$$ | . . X O 1 0 . . . , .
$$ | . . X X O 2 . . . . .
$$ | . . . O X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]

Herw, White has an eye and Black only cutting points.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wm6 Black has no cutting points
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . Y . . 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X O . 2 3 . . . .
$$ | . . X O . 1 . . . , .
$$ | . . X X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . O X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]

Here Black has no cutting points and White is still attackable (i.e. not completely alive).
Hence, atari :b1: above is premature - bad style, IMO.

Before calling a variation obsolete, I still would like to know how to proceed,
once I am in it (i.e. having played E2).
Greetings,
Tommie

3dan EGF (AGA no 13477) || Tommie on KGS: 'June'|| DGS: 'Zhi Laohu' 纸老虎 = 'paper tiger' || Senseis : http://senseis.xmp.net/?tderz ||
ENFP (MBTI) - 'Find your own style within the Fundamentals of Go! '
User avatar
Tommie
Dies with sente
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:56 am
Rank: 3d EGF
GD Posts: 1700
Location: still above sea level: http://bit.ly/eQYULx
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by Tommie »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm1 shape problem for both
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . a . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O B . . . . , .
$$ | . . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . . b . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ ----------------------[/go]


How about practising shape evaluation?
BC as option (c).
Greetings,
Tommie

3dan EGF (AGA no 13477) || Tommie on KGS: 'June'|| DGS: 'Zhi Laohu' 纸老虎 = 'paper tiger' || Senseis : http://senseis.xmp.net/?tderz ||
ENFP (MBTI) - 'Find your own style within the Fundamentals of Go! '
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by Uberdude »

skydyr
Oza
Posts: 2495
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
Location: DC
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 436 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by skydyr »

Uberdude's variation looks fairly equal to me, if not advantageous for black, but wasn't the original comment about it being obsolete that _white_ is too thick?
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Small avalanche variation refutation

Post by Uberdude »

skydyr wrote:Uberdude's variation looks fairly equal to me, if not advantageous for black, but wasn't the original comment about it being obsolete that _white_ is too thick?


Joseki evaluations like that are based on an empty board. This board is not empty. Black already has a strong group on the lower left and white is open at j2, and white has only extended as far as k4 from his thickness so it already clear what profit white can get from that thickness (less than on an empty board where white would make a bigger extension). Black evidently judged it was not too much.
Post Reply