lovelove wrote:Bill Spight wrote:
That is no more joseki. White is thick.
If current opinion is that this is not joseki because White is too thick, then I suppose that
is the deviation from joseki?lovelove wrote:Bill Spight wrote:
That is no more joseki. White is thick.
is the deviation from joseki?SmoothOper wrote:One of the plays that I had learned if you don't want to play out the full avalanche, but still want an even result is, which seems similar to your problem, but black has given up a stone.
is ok when black has played
as nobi for the large avalanche as the 2 stones haven't lost a liberty, like this the hane is too painful for their liberties.emeraldemon wrote:The one I learned is the trade on the SL page:
http://senseis.xmp.net/?SmallAvalanche
Bill Spight wrote:lovelove wrote:Bill Spight wrote:
That is no more joseki. White is thick.
If current opinion is that this is not joseki because White is too thick, then I suppose thatis the deviation from joseki?
Bill Spight wrote:lovelove wrote:Bill Spight wrote:
That is no more joseki. White is thick.
If current opinion is that this is not joseki because White is too thick, then I suppose thatis the deviation from joseki?
lovelove wrote:Black has an option to fight, but the double hane joseki has become really rare.
a or b in the next diagram is the modern choice in this avalanche joseki, which b is becoming more popular.
skydyr wrote:The shape looks similar to the fight that developed from the small-avalanche double hane in my malkovich game against Deflow. It's not exactly the same, but might be worth looking at because it features the same general idea of a crosscut fight stemming from it.
above is premature - bad style, IMO.skydyr wrote:Uberdude's variation looks fairly equal to me, if not advantageous for black, but wasn't the original comment about it being obsolete that _white_ is too thick?