If you've seen any other moves that you suspect to be non-joseki, post them here for discussion.
Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
-
mw42
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:01 pm
- Rank: 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: mw42
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
I've seen
played as a response to
several times on Tygem. My answer has always been to play at (a) forcing white to live small and gaining a nice wall. Has anyone else encountered this, and if so how have you answered this move?
If you've seen any other moves that you suspect to be non-joseki, post them here for discussion.
If you've seen any other moves that you suspect to be non-joseki, post them here for discussion.
- Dusk Eagle
- Gosei
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:02 pm
- Rank: 4d
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 378 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
I don't think it's necessarily a mistake (locally speaking, anyway). However, it is very uncommon, as GoGoD has this position occurring only 15 times out of the 9878 times it occurs. Your move is a pretty common response, as is just taking the 3-3 (and reverting to another joseki).
Last edited by Dusk Eagle on Sun Mar 27, 2011 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
- Numsgil
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 614
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:07 am
- Rank: 1 Kyu KGS
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Numsgil
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
I know what you meant, but...Dusk Eagle wrote:GoGoD has this position occuring only 15 times out of the 9878 times it occurs
- Dusk Eagle
- Gosei
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:02 pm
- Rank: 4d
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 378 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
Yeah, I reread that and I tried to edit it before anyone noticed
. You're too quick.
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
-
mw42
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:01 pm
- Rank: 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: mw42
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
Does GoGoD only contain pro games? I'd be very surprised to see this in a professional game, perhaps you can supply some of the game records to satisfy my curiosity?Dusk Eagle wrote:I don't think it's necessarily a mistake (locally speaking, anyway). However, it is very uncommon, as GoGoD has this position occurring only 15 times out of the 9878 times it occurs. Your move is a pretty common response, as is just taking the 3-3 (and reverting to another joseki).
- Loons
- Gosei
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:17 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: wHam!lton, Aotearoa
- Has thanked: 253 times
- Been thanked: 105 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
It seems black can revert to this joseki if thickness is desirable (normal move order being 1 2 5 4 3, bug Emerus about it if you're curious, I know he likes this one). I dunno if he can place 5 more optimally as a "punishment".
Edit; I guess I'll add what we're all thinking, is this sort of variation possible-
Edit; I guess I'll add what we're all thinking, is this sort of variation possible-
-
amnal
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:42 am
- Rank: 2 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
This kind of thing is fine, in principle, though I'd be inclined to be a little tighter with placing 7, so that I could fight harder. I think I've seen before that 4 is what books list as a mistake because it doesn't really help the white group but it gives black the corner (whereas in the normal joseki white might find it convenient to take the corner later).Loons wrote: Edit; I guess I'll add what we're all thinking, is this sort of variation possible-
I think it's only a minor thing really, as evidenced by the fact that pros have played it ever at all
-
mw42
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:01 pm
- Rank: 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: mw42
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
I like this sequence, but I disagree with amnal that
would be better at (a). In the normal joseki
black plays at
instead of (a) because if B(a) then
will be at
. Later, white can invade the corner
. Black would prefer his shape to be
,
and (a), in my opinion. With that said, I'll try this sequence if it comes up again.
-
amnal
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:42 am
- Rank: 2 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 114 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
I don't think 'in the normal joseki' is really a good way to think about things, because our situation is significantly different.mw42 wrote: I like this sequence, but I disagree with amnal thatwould be better at (a). In the normal joseki black plays at
instead of (a) because if B(a) then
will be at
. Later, white can invade the corner
. Black would prefer his shape to be
,
and (a), in my opinion. With that said, I'll try this sequence if it comes up again.
Looking at it like this, I think that 5 is well placed becasue white doesn't have time to pincer as his stones are lacking in eyespace. It feels like 5 will make it harder for white to settle, and certainly 5 is standard shape to make here. That, plus I am too tenacious for my own good
To clarify, I think both are fine and there seems to be good reasoning behind them. I am not convinced by the 'normal joseki' reasoning, though.
-
mw42
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:01 pm
- Rank: 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: mw42
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
There was a double misunderstanding. When you said "tighter" I thought you meant (a), but you meant (b). Both (b) and
would be good moves here. I think (a) is sub-optimal compared to
for the explanation I gave above.
- Dusk Eagle
- Gosei
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:02 pm
- Rank: 4d
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 378 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
One thing I noticed when browsing through all the games just now is that white almost always has a strong position along the right side when white plays
, making it so that black is cramped along the right. So it very well could be mistake otherwise.
Anyway, here are two games where it occurs:
P.S. Although the player who plays this variation loses both of the games above, the actual win/loss record for this corner position is right around 50%.
Anyway, here are two games where it occurs:
P.S. Although the player who plays this variation loses both of the games above, the actual win/loss record for this corner position is right around 50%.
- Attachments
-
- 2006-09-26d.sgf
- (1.54 KiB) Downloaded 798 times
-
- 2008-05-15f.sgf
- (1.09 KiB) Downloaded 790 times
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
-
cloud
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 9:58 pm
- Rank: AGA 4D
- GD Posts: 15
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
Regarding this diagram, I think a is better in most cases. Look at it this way:
5 is a move played very commonly in this joseki. If 6 is played I would almost certainly answer with 7, so I can't see how the large knight's move would be better.
5 is a move played very commonly in this joseki. If 6 is played I would almost certainly answer with 7, so I can't see how the large knight's move would be better.
- daniel_the_smith
- Gosei
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
- Rank: 2d AGA
- GD Posts: 1193
- KGS: lavalamp
- Tygem: imapenguin
- IGS: lavalamp
- OGS: daniel_the_smith
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
- Contact:
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
Or if we do some tewari...
is clearly terrible, but
is only perhaps a little too close.
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
- Redundant
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:00 pm
- Rank: lazy
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: redundant/silchas
- Tygem: redundant
- Wbaduk: redundant
- DGS: redundant
- OGS: redundant
- Location: Pittsburgh
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Common Joseki Mistake(s) on Tygem
I think a better tewari analysis is this. 6 is a little aji keshi as it removes the possiblity of a 3-3 invasion.
I also want to claim the "skim the thread more thoroughly before posting award", as this diagram has been posted like a dozen times ...
I also want to claim the "skim the thread more thoroughly before posting award", as this diagram has been posted like a dozen times ...
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
One question is why is the following not joseki:
A joseki move for
is not the keima (a), but the shoulder hit:
One reason, as Redundant noted, is W(a) is aji-keshi.
The following is also not joseki: Or, at least
is a rare move. One reason is B is a little thin.
However, if W does the
exchange:
Then B can jump to
-- this may pertain to amnal wanting
to be "tighter."
Another idea
, if the ladder
works for B -- next if W(b), B can extend to (c):
The following is also not joseki: Or, at least
However, if W does the
Another idea